Need help with Trig/angle question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jkh4
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert a point from rectangular coordinates (1, -1) in the fourth quadrant to polar form, use the formulas r = √(x² + y²) and θ = arctan(y/x), adjusting for the quadrant. The angle can be expressed in the format θ = [7(π)/2] + 2n(π) by determining the appropriate reference angle and adding multiples of 2π as needed. If the arctan result is not a whole number, such as 53.1 degrees, it will also yield an irrational value in radians, making it impossible to express neatly in the desired format. Therefore, the conversion process requires careful consideration of both the angle and the quadrant. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate polar coordinate conversion.
jkh4
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
For example: if i have a point (1, -1) in the forth quadrant of the xy plane. How do you convert it to angle = [7(pie)/2]+2n(pie) format? i just forget how to do that part. Also, what if the answer for tan-1(angle) is not a whole #, ex: 53.1, then how do you do the conversion? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To convert from rectangular (x,y) to polar (r,theta):
r=Sqrt[x^2+y^2]
theta=arctan(y/x), after which you must consider the given quadrant

See wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_...rting_between_polar_and_Cartesian_coordinates

If you get an irrational answer in degree form, it's probably going to be irrational in radians form as well, e.g. tan-1[4/3]~53.130deg~.927r. in this case, there's no neat a*Pi+2nPi form, where a is rational and n is integer.

sphoenixee
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top