Need some advice about graduate studies in nonlinear dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematics undergraduate nearing graduation who seeks advice on which subject to self-study over the summer in preparation for graduate school applications. The two subjects under consideration are nonlinear dynamics and algebraic topology. The individual expresses a strong interest in nonlinear dynamics, particularly from an applied perspective, but acknowledges a lack of formal classroom exposure due to scheduling issues at their institution. They also recognize the importance of algebraic topology for graduate studies, especially in relation to dynamical systems, but are concerned about their limited exposure to the subject. The individual is balancing other commitments, including research and GRE preparation, which complicates their ability to study both subjects. Ultimately, they lean towards studying nonlinear dynamics due to personal interest but are seeking insights on which subject would be more beneficial for their academic and career goals. The conversation highlights the importance of independent study and the challenges of course availability in academic planning.
kanima
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
First off, though I've been reading through these forums for a while now, this is my first post here, so let me briefly introduce myself.

I'm finishing up my third year as an undergraduate in mathematics. Next year, I want to apply to grad school in math, specifically, I'd like to study nonlinear dynamics. While my major is currently pure math, my interests have shifted towards applied mathematics in the past year, so I'd especially like to study dynamics from an applied perspective.

In preparation for that, I've undertaken to self-study at least one subject this coming summer. I'm trying to decide which of the following two subjects would be more important for me: nonlinear dynamics (with Strogatz), or algebraic topology (Hatcher has been recommended to me).

Now you're probably thinking nonlinear dynamics seems like the obvious answer, but let me say some more.

Unfortunately, I won't actually be able to study dynamical systems until the second semester of next school year. The reason for this is that the course is only offered every two years, and in my second year, which is the last time it was offered, I was inadequately prepared for the subject. Although I would mention in my grad school application that I planned on taking the class, I think it might look bad that I hadn't had any real experience with the subject by the time I'd be applying.

As for algebraic topology, my school, which is otherwise considered a good school in many respects, only very rarely offers a course in topology due to budget cuts in the past years (you can imagine that many students, including myself, and many professors, are greatly dismayed at this situation). So by the time I graduate, my only exposure to the field will be from my brief excursions into basic point-set topology covered in my analysis classes. Of course, topology is very important for any student wishing to study at the graduate level, and also very important in dynamical systems.

Something that people on here might ask is: why am I so intent on studying a subject I haven't had classroom exposure to yet? I had considered that, and in fact, the reason I'm asking the question above is that I believe the schools I apply to will be asking the same thing.

All I can say is, I've read quite a bit about the subject, so I'm not completely clueless, I simply haven't studied it in-depth yet. Furthermore, outside of mathematics, my interests lie mainly in the broad domain of pattern formation in nature. Since there's a wide range of fascinating natural nonlinear systems (flocks, neural systems, weather systems, etc.) that exhibit this property, it would be impossible for me to study them all, and so I'd rather look at them from an abstract (mathematical) point of view.

Looks like I made this question pretty long, so hopefully someone will take the time to read it and give me their opinion. Thanks.

(I just realized I might get the answer: study them both. This might not be feasible, as I have other commitments this coming summer, including some research I'll be doing with one of my profs and studying for GRE's. So I'm asking: in case I only have time to study one of the subjects, which one should it be?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hate to bump this thread, but I realize now (seeing how my post has very few views at all) that I probably chose a bad title; unfortunately I can't change it.

Anyone have any advice as to which of these subjects would be more important in my situation?
 
looks like your mind is displaying some non-linear dynamics in writing a ~300 word question that sums up to: which class should i take?ps: if i were a grad school admissions committee, i'd be more worried about your inability to choose your classes on your own than whether you've taken a NLD class yet.
 
Yeah... I guess went overboard with the question, I was just trying to make it as clear as possible, but perhaps I did the opposite.

Anyway, I'm not really asking about a class I should take, rather about which subject might be preferable for independent study.

I'm not dependent on the replies I get to this post, and I'm quite capable of making my own decision. As things stand, I will probably choose to study dynamics on my own as I personally find that subject more appealing. The only reason I'm asking here is to see if anyone has any good insight, but I can get along quite well if that's not the case.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top