Schools Need some advice on how to be successful in college

  • Thread starter Thread starter stingray191
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    College
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on effective study strategies for college students, particularly in engineering disciplines. A sophomore electrical engineering major expresses the challenge of balancing study time with effective learning, noting that studying for more than three to four hours leads to confusion and diminished retention. Participants share their study patterns, emphasizing the importance of quality over quantity in study sessions. Many advocate for shorter, focused study periods with breaks, suggesting that mini-breaks can enhance concentration and retention. The significance of a conducive study environment is highlighted, with preferences for quiet, distraction-free spaces like libraries. Some students recommend a proactive approach, such as reviewing material before class and engaging with the content through note-taking and questions. This method not only aids understanding but also helps maintain a regular sleep schedule, reducing the need for last-minute cramming. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for personalized study techniques that cater to individual learning styles and schedules.
stingray191
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am currently a sophmore electrical engineering major. It is very important to me that I both learn the material that is being presented and to get good grades. I know that to do these things one must study and study hard. However, I find that there are only a few times during the day during which I can actually study effectively. That is, I've found that if I try to study more than my brain "wants" to, I end confusing myself and un-learning the concepts. The maximum number of hours I can study/do homework before this "confusion" kicks in and my mind starts to wander is about three to four hours. Can anyone on this forum who has been successful in school, and I know there are many of you, describe their study patterns while in college? How much did you study? Did you study in spurts or for long stretches? This is very important to me because I am trying to develop an optimal study schedule that I can use for many years to come but I can't seem to create one. Thank you very much and any additional tips/advice for a motivated student will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about other people, but I try to find enthusiasm for the subject despite not enjoying it sometimes. Some subjects are easier to have a passion for, like you would probably rather take an EE class than music appreciation, but realizing that it is an opportunity more than a chore not only makes me want to study, but I can grasp concepts easier.

I work during the day so my schedule may not offer much help, but I have a couple hours in between class and a few more at night where I can study. My total time ranges from eight hour days of solid studying, to other days of dividing two hours between three subjects.

I consider location a big factor for me, also. I usually cannot be near a computer because I will become distracted. I consider a big, open table at a library very soothing. I don't listen to music unless I am doing math problems, and if a concept takes to long for me to grasp, I will move on and a new angle of viewing it will hit me.

But every person is different, so I suggest you try out different methods until you find your own. Study time is different than study quality, and I have had moments where ten minutes of thinking about a concept while working helps out more than reading about it for an hour.
 
Do you take mini-breaks within those 3-4 hour stretches of studying? I usually take a 10 minute break or so after an hour of studying, which refreshes my mind for another hour. For me, that maximizes my full capacity for learning. I can't imagine myself doing it for 3-4 hours straight without taking any kind of breaks whatsoever.
 
I am a senior mechanical engineer and I have been taking mostly advanced undergraduate and graduate level courses for about a year now. I rarely ever "study" one subject for more than an hour or so at a time. My homework usually takes much longer than an hour but I have found it is much more effective for me to spread out my studying. For example I wake up early and read the sections that I will be covering in class that day. Than I go to class and take notes and ask questions. Than that evening I spend some time reviewing what I learned. Every so often I go back and do a short review if I can't recall something. This pattern plus the homework and reviewing the material around test time is usually enough for me so by the time the test rolls around I actually understand the material very well and it is generally not worth it to spend hours doing practice problems. This also let's me keep a regular sleep schedule so I don't fall asleep during my classes and I don't have to stay up really late studying around test time which just makes me tired so I do poorly anyways.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top