Needs maths guidance for Physics Bachelor

AI Thread Summary
A 19-year-old aspiring physics student seeks guidance on math preparation after recently discovering a passion for the subject, influenced by physicists like Feynman and Sagan. Despite struggling with physics initially, improved math skills led to significant academic progress. The student considers either taking a year to strengthen math foundations or enrolling in a free pre-course offered by the university. Responses emphasize that waiting is unnecessary, as all students face challenges in their first semester, and prior physics courses are not critical for success. Ultimately, pursuing physics is encouraged as it provides a solid scientific framework, with the option to transition to cognitive science later.
Cenote
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Where shall I begin, I am 19 years old now and I have this very strong desire to study physics, ever since I was introduced to Feynman and Carl Sagan and other famous physicists.
After reading a bit more about the field I was amazed by the sheer variety of interesting fields physics had to offer so that I made up my mind: I want to study physics.

So now here is my conundrum: I have only had this insight very recently, so I am thinking that I missed out on taking advanced courses in both physics and maths. While my satisfaction from doing maths has skyrocketed due to my ambition, I am not entirely sure if it will suffice.
I had struggled with physics earlier but when I finally got around to actually do maths properly it was a great deal of fun and I ended up going from an almost F to a B.

This is why I have two choices now, I could either wait a year, and thoroughly go over every math skill that I might need to fresh up on, or, I could also just take a sort of "pre-course" of maths that my university offers (for free!) for people who are in kind of the situation that I am right now, to make sure that they have the maths skills required to study physics.

I actually started wanting to study cognitive science but was persuaded by a friend to study physics instead, because it was a way better introduction to the scientific method and science in general and that I could change into neuroscience later on.

I hope this is somewhat intelligible, since English is not my native language, so I am sorry if I made any grave mistakes and I would appreciate any advice you could give me.PS: I forgot to mention that my university gave out a .pdf with a summary of everything maths related that I should know. http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/studium/intphysik/img/brueckenkurs.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no need to worry.

There is no need to wait a year either.
You will have a bumpy first semester whether you spend one year preparing or not, every student has to go through this experience :biggrin:

Regarding the missing physics courses, its not that important as any school level courses are really introductory, and you will be going through those topics with more depth during your degree.

The pdf document you linked to seems like a compact bridging course, and its very short.
The details are here:
http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/studium/fsi/erstsemester/index.html

In terms of topics, it should be sufficient.
This bridging course is actually a non-official must for every student.
 
Well that alleviated me from a lot of worries that I had, thank you very much.
 
Cenote said:
I actually started wanting to study cognitive science but was persuaded by a friend to study physics instead, because it was a way better introduction to the scientific method and science in general ...

What were his grounds for suggesting that?
 
Well I can only quote what he wrote to me:

If my suggestion be considered, DO NOT TAKE COGNITIVE science. I know why you want to take it :(. I know people who did the exact same mistake, believe me. They had hard time changing back to physics.

Just go for pure physics and mathematical physics. Read some Neuro books (good ones AND POPULAR SCIENCE). Later you can change to Cognitive science easily.

The reason I am saying this is that Physics is a mature, full science that has a good framework. Pursuing THEORETICAL Physics will open your mind to the methodology of sciences. It will actually broaden your vision for other sciences as well while giving you tremendous flexibility.
 
If you want to study cognitive science, you should study cognitive science. Your friend's advice is misguided.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top