Is Negative Energy Possible in Capacitors?

In summary, the electrostatic energy in a capacitor is positive, not negative. If a capacitor is constructed by bringing positive and negative plates from infinity to a separation ##d##, it would gain energy in the process, but the overall energy would still be positive. This is because the electric field energy of a capacitor is less than the electric field energy of two charges at infinite separation. However, creating the plates at infinity requires energy, so the overall energy of the system would still be positive.
  • #1
johne1618
371
0
The electrostatic energy in a capacitor is negative is it not?

If one had enough positive and negative charge on the plates so that the electrostatic energy was greater in magnitude than the rest mass energy then the system as a whole would have a negative total energy.

Would this be possible and how would such a system behave?

In general relativity negative pressure behaves like negative gravitational mass.

But if the capacitor is static then the negative electrostatic pressure must be balanced by the positive pressure in the structure of the capacitor so that the overall gravitational mass doesn't change.

Maybe that's why the total mass/energy must remain constant as the capacitor is charged up?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
johne1618 said:
The electrostatic energy in a capacitor is negative is it not?

No it's not. The energy of a capacitor can be written as:
[tex] Energy = \frac{C V^2}{2} [/tex]
or
[tex] Energy = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int E^2 dV [/tex]

Both are positive quantities.
 
  • #3
phyzguy said:
No it's not. The energy of a capacitor can be written as:
[tex] Energy = \frac{C V^2}{2} [/tex]
or
[tex] Energy = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int E^2 dV [/tex]

Both are positive quantities.

But if you constructed a capacitor by bringing positive and negative plates from infinity to a separation ##d## you would gain energy in the process. I must admit that's not the normal way one charges a capacitor though.
 
  • #4
johne1618 said:
But if you constructed a capacitor by bringing positive and negative plates from infinity to a separation ##d## you would gain energy in the process. I must admit that's not the normal way one charges a capacitor though.

Yes, you would gain energy. So the electric field energy of a capacitor constructed like this would be less than the electric field energy was when the two plates were at infinite separation. However, it would still be positive. Try calculating the electric field energy of two charges at inifinite separation and compare it to the electric field energy of a dipole created by having those two charges at a separation d. You will see that the energy of the second configuration is less, but they are both positive.
 
  • #5
phyzguy said:
Yes, you would gain energy. So the electric field energy of a capacitor constructed like this would be less than the electric field energy was when the two plates were at infinite separation. However, it would still be positive. Try calculating the electric field energy of two charges at inifinite separation and compare it to the electric field energy of a dipole created by having those two charges at a separation d. You will see that the energy of the second configuration is less, but they are both positive.

I think I see what you mean.

The total electrostatic energy of a system of two spheres with charges ##q## and ##-q## is:

$$U = \frac{kq^2}{2r} + \frac{kq^2}{2r} - \frac{kq^2}{d}$$

where the radius of the spheres is ##r## and the separation ##d##.

$$U = k q^2 \left( \frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{d} \right)$$

As ##d>r## then the total electrostatic energy ##U## must be greater than zero.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
johne1618 said:
But if you constructed a capacitor by bringing positive and negative plates from infinity to a separation ##d## you would gain energy in the process. I must admit that's not the normal way one charges a capacitor though.

You would have to first create a negative plate at infinity on one side and a positive plate on infinity on the other side. They don't come for free and they require energy
 

1. What is a negative energy capacitor?

A negative energy capacitor is a device that stores and releases negative energy. This type of energy is not the same as the negative charge carried by electrons, but rather a theoretical form of energy that has not yet been proven to exist.

2. How does a negative energy capacitor work?

The exact mechanism of how a negative energy capacitor works is still being studied and is not fully understood. However, it is believed that it involves creating a state of negative energy within the capacitor's structure, which can then be harnessed for various purposes.

3. What are the potential uses of a negative energy capacitor?

Some potential uses of a negative energy capacitor include creating powerful and efficient energy sources, enabling faster-than-light travel, and even manipulating the fabric of space and time. However, these applications are currently only theoretical and have not been proven or implemented yet.

4. Can negative energy capacitors be used in everyday life?

At this time, negative energy capacitors are still in the early stages of research and development, and are not available for everyday use. However, if their potential applications are proven and they can be successfully harnessed, they could have a significant impact on various industries and technologies in the future.

5. Are there any potential risks or drawbacks to using negative energy capacitors?

As with any new technology, there are potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered and addressed. Some scientists have raised concerns about the potential instability and unpredictability of negative energy, as well as the potential for unintended consequences when harnessing and manipulating it. Further research and testing are needed to fully understand the risks and benefits of negative energy capacitors.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
892
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
719
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
360
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top