Negative Gravity? Is GPE Really -mgh?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the sign convention of gravitational potential energy (GPE) and its relationship with gravitational force. GPE is defined as mgh, where GPE is positive when measured above a reference point, typically ground level. The force of gravity is represented as negative due to its direction pointing downward, which aligns with the negative gradient of GPE. The choice of coordinate system can affect the sign of gravitational force, but the underlying physics remains consistent across different conventions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (GPE) and its formula (mgh)
  • Familiarity with the concept of conservative forces in physics
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems and their impact on force direction
  • Basic principles of mechanics, particularly in relation to energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of forces from potential energy functions in classical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of different coordinate systems on force calculations
  • Learn about the concept of conservative forces and their characteristics
  • Investigate the relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and gravitational potential energy (GPE) in various scenarios
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of mechanics, particularly those studying energy concepts and gravitational forces.

conquerer7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
This has been bothering me, since I just realized I've never really thought about it. What's the correct sign of gravity? Of course, it's supposed to be negative, since it points down, but in GPE (mgh) it seems to be positive. GPE is positive above the zero level, and so g must be positive as well, right? Is GPE really -mgh, or does the g really mean the magnitude of gravity, without counting its sign?

I'm asking this now because I'm doing a question where I need to find KE and GPE in terms a few common variables, one of which is gravity, which in the problem clearly has to point down. The only way I can get KE to have the right sign is to make gravity positive throughout the whole problem (or put it in absolute value bars?), which doesn't make sense to me after being told it's always negative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm, I am about to graduate with a physics degree and I am wondering about the answer to this. I could go on, but in other words, tag.
 
Potential energy is measured relative to some arbitrary starting point. If you set GPE to zero at ground level, then GPE becomes positive as you move up. If you set GPE to zero at "infinity", as is often done with gravity, then GPE at ground level is negative and becomes less negative as you move up. In either case, however, it is increasing as you go up.

The force of gravity is negative of the rate of change of GPE with respect to position, as with any conservative force. So if your GPE is mgh, F = -d(mgh)/dh = -mg, which automatically has the correct sign. In simpler terms, if potential energy increases as you go up, force points down.

Of course, the sign depends on the choice of the coordinate. Sometimes it may be convenient to measure "depth" as the positive coordinate. In that system, gravitational force will have a positive sign, but only because you flipped coordinate system upside down.

Hmmm, I am about to graduate with a physics degree and I am wondering about the answer to this.
That's a really bad sign. You are supposed to be able to deal with generalized forces in generalized coordinates. So deriving a force vector from given conservative potential should be something you could do in your sleep. Have you not had a descent mechanics course?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K