Negative permeability of split ring resonators(SRR)

AI Thread Summary
Negative permeability in split ring resonators (SRRs) occurs between the resonant frequency and the plasma frequency, with the eigenfrequency representing specific resonant modes influenced by field polarization. The eigenfrequency is not necessarily the frequency at which negative permeability occurs, as it relates to the resonant modes of the structure. Resonance leads to a change in the sign of the real and imaginary parts of permeability and permittivity, complicating their definitions at resonance. Operating at resonance is generally avoided due to increased loss, with designs typically placing the resonance slightly off the operating frequency to minimize loss while achieving negative parameters. Nonlinear effects of surrounding dielectrics are usually not considered, but the effective behavior of SRRs can exhibit nonlinearity based on the incident field.
Sana5643
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Negative permeability of split ring resonators(SRR) is obtained between the resonant frequency and the Plasma frequency of the SRRs, then what is the meaning 'eigenfrequency' of split ring resonator(SRR).
Is eigenfrequncy is that 'frequency' at what negative permeability occur ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I 'm not sure i fully understand your question but the eigenfrequency of a SRR depends on the polarization of the field: you can excite the LC resonance at the gap, or the SPP resonance at the SRR's branches (or even both). Each one of these is an eigenfrequency of the SRR. [I am referring to the case of normal incidence; the situation becomes complicated for oblique incidence.]
 


im asking about eigenfrequency of SRR when it is embedded in dielectric whose permitivitty is non linear.Also permeability is nonlinear. both permitivitty and permeability are incident field intensity dependent.
 


I doesn't matter. When they are talking about eigenfrequencies, they mean the frequencies of the modes, resonant modes, of the structure. It may not necessarily accord to the frequencies where the permeability and/or permittivity are negative. Of course it shouldn't since the resonance means a change in sign in the real/imaginary part and a peak in the imaginary/real part of the parameter (this can be verified via the Kramers-Kronig relation). So at the resonance the permittivity or permeability is generally ill-defined (in an ideal resonance, in reality it's just going to be very small) since it is changing sign. We do not want to operate at the resonance mostly because it corresponds to a peak in the loss (imaginary part). What you generally do is design the SRR so that the resonance is a bit off from the operating frequency so that you can not only be in the small area where the parameter is negative but also try to compromise on the amount of loss.

EDIT: Normally though we do not consider the surrounding dielectric (if there is one) to be nonlinear. As pipe-squeezed-angle_bracket explained, the resonances of the SRR are dependent upon the incident field. If we permeate a volume or surface with our SRR and consider the bulk behavior of this volume/surface so that it has an effective permeability/permittivity then we find that it is non-linear (for the reasons why the physics of the SRR are dependent upon the incident wave).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
722
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top