Negative Resistance: Is It Real or Just Fringe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of negative resistance, particularly in relation to carbon nanotubes and historical references to Gabriel Kron's work. Participants debate whether negative resistance is a legitimate phenomenon or merely fringe science, with some asserting that it should not be included in Wikipedia if it lacks scientific credibility. The conversation highlights the distinction between static negative resistance and negative differential resistance, emphasizing that true negative resistance would imply a device that supplies power. The mention of tunneling diodes illustrates that while negative differential resistance exists, it does not equate to static negative resistance. Overall, the topic raises questions about the classification and understanding of negative resistance in scientific literature.
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,392
Reaction score
3
From wikipedia, there is a reference to "composite configuration of carbon nanotubes which appears to exhibit anomalous results which resemble a static negative resistor", and "Gabriel Kron, while a scientist for General Electric, is thought to have built a negative resistor for the US Navy's "Network Analyser"."

Is there more to this (or is it a 'fringe' case)? If the latter, does it really belong in wiki?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's not a fringe case. look up the tunneling diode link at the wiki article. tunneling diodes do have a (U,I)-region like that.
 
Tunnel Diode is not a static device, its Imposssible within the laws of Physics to have a static negative resistor.
 
As far as I can understand the Wikipeida arttical it's talking about negative differential resistance and therefore I don't really find it unbeliavabele (perhaps a bit unusual).
 
Yes, negative differential resistance means that although it has a positive
resistance, a slight increase inthe voltage causes less current to flow.

A true negative resistance supplies power.
 

Thread 'Maxwell stress tensor'

This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
View full post »
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
Replies
21
Views
4K
Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
Replies
8
Views
4K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 241)
Replies
8
Views
5K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 264)
Replies
6
Views
4K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
Replies
7
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
Replies
7
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top