Negative Work: What Does it Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacobim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of work in physics, specifically addressing the scenario of a person holding a chair without any displacement. It clarifies that while gravity exerts a negative force, no work is done when the chair remains stationary because work requires displacement. The energy exerted by the person is acknowledged, but it does not equate to work done on the chair. The conversation emphasizes that for gravity to do negative work, there must be an opposing displacement, which is absent in this case. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that work is defined by displacement, not merely by the application of force.
Jacobim
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In my textbook there is given an example of a person holding a chair for three minutes. The persons arm gets tired but no work is done because there is no displacement.

In the sidebar of my textbook, there is this note:

"We can calculate the work done by a force on an object, but that force is not necessarily the cause of the obect's displacement. For example, if you lift an object, (negative) work is done on the object by the gravitational force, although gravity is not the cause of the object moving upward!"

So if in the case of the person holding up a chair, if gravity is doing negative work, then for there to be net zero work done, there must be some positive work done by the person.

So how can they say there is no work done here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the textbook?
 
Physics for Scientists and Engineers 8th edition, by Serway and Jewett
 
Jacobim said:
So if in the case of the person holding up a chair, if gravity is doing negative work, then for there to be net zero work done, there must be some positive work done by the person.
Gravity only does negative work when you lift the object. Negative work just means that the force and the displacement act in opposite directions.
So how can they say there is no work done here?
Work requires a displacement. If you just hold up a chair there is no displacement, so neither gravity nor the upward force you exert do any work on the chair.
 
oh ok, that's pretty obvious now, thanks
 
Jacobim said:
In my textbook there is given an example of a person holding a chair for three minutes. The persons arm gets tired but no work is done because there is no displacement.

In the sidebar of my textbook, there is this note:

"We can calculate the work done by a force on an object, but that force is not necessarily the cause of the obect's displacement. For example, if you lift an object, (negative) work is done on the object by the gravitational force, although gravity is not the cause of the object moving upward!"

So if in the case of the person holding up a chair, if gravity is doing negative work, then for there to be net zero work done, there must be some positive work done by the person.

So how can they say there is no work done here?

Gravity does no work on the chair held in the same position for 3 minutes. You can hang the chair on a hook rather than holding it. Gravity does no work in either case.
The side note does not apply directly to your problem.
The energy spent by our body when applying a force on something in a fixed position was discussed several times.
It is related to the way the muscles work.

Edit. Sorry, I was too late.
 
For gravity to do negative work, the force must be opposite to the displacement.

So yes, to counter gravity doing negative work, there must be someone pushing against gravity!

Claude.
 
Back
Top