Neither of those is a real number, much less a positive real number.

Bob Busby
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
How do you get the exponential form of 1/j? I saw a problem that says it's e^(-j*pi/2) but I have no idea where that came from.

Also, if you have a complex number, z, how do you find it's magnitude? For example, e^(j*pi*t - pi/2). In my book when they square the the magnitude of a complex number they multiply by the conjugate (e.g. |z|^2 = e^(j*pi*t - pi/2) * e^(-j*pi*t + pi/2) Why is this? Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For your first question, note that 1/j = -j. To get this take 1/j and multiply by j/j:
\frac{1}{j}=\frac{j}{j^2}=-j

For your second question, the definition of the magnitude of a complex number is that it is the square root of itself times its complex conjugate. To see that this corresponds to the distance from the origin when complex numbers are plotted as points in a plane, notice that if z=a+bj, then
zz*=(a+bj)(a-bj)=a2 + b2
Which is the square of the distance from the origin by the Pythagorean theorem.
 
Bob Busby said:
How do you get the exponential form of 1/j? I saw a problem that says it's e^(-j*pi/2) but I have no idea where that came from.
You could start with Euler's identity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity:

e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0

==>

e^{i \pi} = -1

(e^{i \pi})^{1/2} = \sqrt{-1} = i

e^{i \pi/2} = i

(e^{i \pi/2})^{-1} = \frac{1}{i} = -i

e^{-i \pi/2} = -i

Alternatively you could start with Euler's formula:

e^{i\varphi} = \cos{\varphi} + i \sin{\varphi}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula

Now from this Wikipedia diagram of the complex plane...

220px-Euler%27s_formula.svg.png


... it can be seen that when the real part is zero, that \varphi must be \pi/2 so:

e^{i\pi/2} = \cos{(\pi/2)} + i \sin{(\pi/2)} = i

(since \cos{(\pi/2)}=0 and \sin{(\pi/2)}=1)

e^{-i\pi/2} = -i = 1/i
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ohhh my god... that question make me headache almost the time...:)
 
if z is a complex no...Z=X =iY then the magnitude of Z is simply =√ X+iY
 
chwala said:
if z is a complex no...Z=X =iY then the magnitude of Z is simply =√ X+iY
Completely wrong. If Z= X+iY then the magnitude of Z is the non-negative real number
\sqrt{X^2+ Y^2}

\sqrt{X+ iY}
is any of those complex numbers whose square is X+ iY

For example, if z= i= 0+ i(1) then the magnitude of z is |z|= \sqrt{1^2+ 1^2}= \sqrt{2}. But
\sqrt{z}= \sqrt{ i}= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}i
or
\sqrt{z}= \sqrt{i}= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}- \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}i
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top