Net force due to gravity (sort of conceptual questions)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating net gravitational forces in a system of masses arranged in geometric configurations, specifically an equilateral triangle and a square. The key conclusion is that for mass M to balance the gravitational forces from two masses m, M must equal m in the triangular arrangement. Additionally, when calculating forces in component form, it is essential to use the correct distance from the mass to the point of interest, as using incorrect distances leads to erroneous results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of universal gravitation (Fg=GmM/r^2)
  • Concept of center of mass in a gravitational field
  • Vector decomposition in physics
  • Basic principles of gravitational fields and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study gravitational force calculations in various geometric configurations
  • Learn about the concept of center of mass and its applications in physics
  • Explore vector decomposition techniques for force calculations
  • Investigate the effects of distance on gravitational force magnitude
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on gravitational forces and vector analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of conceptual misunderstandings in gravitational calculations.

LogicX
Messages
175
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c13/fig13_37.gif

Masses m are the same on the bottom, and the net gravitational force is 0 on m4 which is located at the center of an equilateral triangle. What is the mass of M?

Homework Equations



Fg=GmM/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, obviously the answer is that M=m because its an equilateral triangle so the masses on all three sides must be the same. But I was thinking about it conceptually a different way and I'm not sure why it doesn't work.

Lets say you find the center of mass of the bottom two. It is located halfway between them both. So you can consider both masses of m as if they were in that point right? So the center of mass (with mass 2m) is in line with M and the same distance away from m4 as M, because m4 is in the center of the triangle. So in order for M to offset 2m to 0, M must equal 2m. What am I doing wrong here?

Here is another one.

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c13/qu_1.8.gif

What is the net force on the center mass, in component form? (and you are given the different masses of all the particles, and a side length of the square)

I got this one correct using the regular method of getting each force from each mass on the center mass (with r being half of the diagonal through the square) to get a vector and then using sin45 and cos45 to divide the vector into component form. But then I got it wrong by doing it this way:

Instead of getting the magnitude of the total vector I tried to solve for each component separately. So taking an example force, say the y component of the force of mass 2 on mass 5. I tried to use an r value of side length/2 because that is how far away it is in the y direction. Shouldn't this have worked?

Thanks.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
LogicX said:
Lets say you find the center of mass of the bottom two. It is located halfway between them both. So you can consider both masses of m as if they were in that point right?
No. If the two masses were in a uniform gravitational field and you wanted to find the net force acting on them, then you can use that approach. But that's not what's going on here. Here you are trying to find the field created by those masses.

Actually do the calculation of the field created by the two masses at point m4. Then compare it to the field from a single mass of 2m directly below m4.
 
LogicX said:
Instead of getting the magnitude of the total vector I tried to solve for each component separately. So taking an example force, say the y component of the force of mass 2 on mass 5. I tried to use an r value of side length/2 because that is how far away it is in the y direction. Shouldn't this have worked?
No. Take this example. Mass m is at the origin. The point P is at (1 m, 10000000 m). Clearly the force at P is small because it's over 10000000 m away from mass m. If you computed the x-component based on a distance of only 1 m, you'd be wildly wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K