My understanding is that Fermi has results that show the mixing angle for neutrinos is not the same as the mixing angle for anti-neutrinos. Is there a theory that explains this?
The mixing angles/phases themselves are the same for neutrinos and anti-neutrinos as they are real numbers. The overall oscillation may be effected by an additional phase which is not real a real but instead a complex number. Only complex phases would show a difference between neutrino and anti-neutrino because the sign in front of complex phases is opposite for each.
I am slowly going through the maths behind neutrino oscillations in my blog series of posts
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks.
The original paper came out last year:
"The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024)
The recent follow-up and other responses are
"η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al
"Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner
"Astrophysical...