Neutron capture by light nuclei

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on neutron capture reactions involving light nuclei, particularly focusing on the potential for producing deuterium from protium through neutron capture. Participants explore various reactions involving light nuclei and their implications for energy production and neutron behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether neutron capture reactions exist for light nuclei, specifically asking about the possibility of producing deuterium from protons capturing neutrons.
  • Another participant explains that a proton can combine with a neutron to form a deuteron, which can further capture a neutron to become tritium, but notes that the cross-section for neutron capture by deuterium is very small.
  • A participant mentions that He-3 is an effective neutron capturer, producing He-4, and highlights B-10 as another effective neutron absorber used in neutron detectors.
  • One participant calculates that the reaction 10B + n --> 11B would be exothermic and suggests it has a high energy yield, questioning why this reaction isn't used for energy production.
  • Another participant responds that the energy release from the thermal neutron capture reaction involving B-10 is significantly less than that of uranium fission and notes that neutron multiplication is not present, making it unsuitable for energy production.
  • It is mentioned that free protons can capture thermal neutrons to form deuterons, releasing a gamma ray in the process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and energy potential of neutron capture reactions involving light nuclei. There is no consensus on the practicality of these reactions for energy production, as some participants highlight limitations while others propose calculations suggesting otherwise.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions regarding energy yields and reaction suitability for energy production remain unresolved, with participants providing differing interpretations of the reactions' viability.

Nyme
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a decent understanding of neutron-induced reactions in heavy nuclei (fission, capture), but less so when light nuclei are involved. I do know of Li6 + n --> He4 + T and the Li7 equivalent. Those reactions are more like nucleus splitting (fission).

My question is: do neutron capture reactions for light nuclei exist? I'm mainly thinking of protium. Would it be possible to produce deuterium by having protons capture neutrons? I read about proton-neutron collisions (as a shielding measure against a neutron flux, slowing the neutrons down), but those didn't involve a forming of a new nucleus. Where do those neutrons actually go after being slowed down? Are they just around until they decay to protons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In protium, a proton can combine with a neutron to form a deuteron in a deuterium atom, and deuteron could capture a neutron and become a triton, which is the nucleus of tritium. The cross-section for n-capture by deuterium is very small, hence the motivation to use heavy water as a moderator in CANDU reactors.

He-3 is a particular effective capturer (absorber) of neutrons, and the product is He-4.

B-10 is another effective absorber of neutrons and is used in neutron detectors and control rods in nuclear reactors.

n(6Li,α)T is a source of tritium.

Be is a good reflector of neutrons, and at high (fast) energies induces an (n,2n) reaction.


Protons effectively moderate neutrons since they have approximately the same mass, and by that a neutron may lose up to half of its kinetic energy (by virtue of the conservation of energy and momentum).

If neutrons are not absorbed, they will eventually decay into a proton, electron and anti-neutrino.
 
Thanks for the reply, much useful information in that.

About these reactions: something has to be wrong in my calculations. I've calculated that 10B + n --> 11B would be exothermic and yield 11.5 MeV. This seems quite an energy to me. That's approx. 111 TJ/kg. The energy density rivals that of ordinary heavy-nucleus fission. One would just need a neutron flux.

Can someone correct my calculation, or tell me why isn't this used in energy production?
 
The thermal neutron n + B^10 capture reaction goes to lithium 7 and an alpha particle, plus about 2.3 MeV of ionization energy. The energy release is nearly 100 times less than uranium fission per nucleus, plus the fact that there is no neutron multiplication to sustain the reaction, makes this reaction unsuitable for energy production. I would guess that if you put boron into a reactor, you would poison (quench) the reaction by absorbing neutrons.

Free protons will capture thermal neutrons to form deuterons, and and emit a 2.2 MeV gamma ray.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K