New method of propulsion, or simple BS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Propulsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on skepticism regarding a website claiming to outline a new method of propulsion, particularly in light of its unprofessional appearance and lack of credible sources. Participants emphasize the importance of critical thinking and thorough research when evaluating scientific claims, especially those that seem extraordinary. The Biefeld-Brown effect is mentioned, clarifying that while it can lift small weights through corona discharge, it does not constitute anti-gravity and is ineffective in space. Genuine scientific advancements are noted to undergo peer review and be published in reputable journals, contrasting with the dubious nature of the claims presented on the site. Overall, the conversation underscores the necessity of skepticism and careful evaluation of information in the realm of science.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Someone on a guitar forum posted a link to this site, which supposedly outlines a new method of propulsion. I'm in high school and I haven't even taken physics yet, so I really am in no position to debunk this, but generally sites that look like that are just nonsense.

So, does anyone who knows their stuff have a reason why this stuff is all just garbage, like those eternal-life bracelets, or is this stuff actually legitimate and just made by a very poor web-designer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many of the fad sites for the Biefeld-Brown effect try to sell it as about the physics of capaciters, but this wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld-Brown_effect, tells you what is really going on: corona discharge. Yes you can lift small weights with it. No it isn't anti-gravity. It only works within an atmosphere that can be ionized (not in space, therefor).
 


It's always important to approach any new information or claims with a critical eye, especially when it comes to scientific advancements. In this case, it's understandable that you may not have the knowledge or background to fully understand the information presented on the website. However, the fact that the website looks unprofessional and lacks credible sources or evidence to support its claims is a red flag.

It's always important to do thorough research and fact-checking before believing in something, especially when it comes to something as complex as a new method of propulsion. It's also worth noting that genuine scientific advancements typically go through a rigorous peer-review process and are published in reputable scientific journals, rather than being presented on a poorly designed website.

In conclusion, it's always best to approach these types of claims with skepticism and to seek out more reliable sources and evidence before coming to any conclusions. As a high school student, it's great that you're already questioning the legitimacy of this information and seeking out more informed opinions. Keep up the critical thinking and always be cautious of information that seems too good to be true.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top