New Theory of Spacetime: Is Time the 4th Dimension?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter [Quadratic]
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a new theory of spacetime that posits time is not the fourth dimension, challenging the established concepts of special relativity. Participants argue that the article merely reiterates the principles of special relativity, specifically the absence of absolute time, while introducing philosophical interpretations. The consensus indicates that the theory does not present groundbreaking insights but rather repackages existing scientific understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime
  • Basic knowledge of philosophical implications in scientific theories
  • Awareness of popular science communication methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of special relativity on modern physics
  • Explore philosophical interpretations of time in physics
  • Study the historical context of spacetime theories
  • Examine critiques of popular science articles on complex theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of spacetime and the communication of scientific theories to the public.

[Quadratic]
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/04/spacetime-has-no-time-dimension-new-theory-claims-that-time-is-not-the-4th-dimension.html

I'm sorry for being so clueless, but isn't that article basically saying exactly what special relativity said in the first place? That there is no absolute time? It seems to me that the science is more or less the same, but with the addition of dopey philosophy.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, allowing for the fact that this is a newspaper or magazine popularization of what was said, rather than was actually said, that appears to be exactly what happened- they are just rephrasing the theory of relativity. Of course if a (locally) well known scientist were to announce that "2+ 2= 4", the (local) newspapers would jump all over it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
17K