New to the Einstein notation, having trouble with basic calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ineedhelpimbadatphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein notation
Ineedhelpimbadatphys
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
picture below.
Relevant Equations
no equations, but I am most interested in c), d), g) and e). I would like to know if my attempts are correct. If not, what am I doing wrong?
We are using minkowski metric.
IMG_2210.jpeg
?hash=cceb4ce37c5fbf4c97f1a43dd1194424.jpg
IMG_2518.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 87
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked your arithmetic, but (c) seems correct, if long-winded. You could just say ##A^{(ab)}=\frac 12(A^{ab}+A^{ba})## by definition.

Similarly (d), where you can just say ##A^{[ab]}=\frac 12(A^{ab}-A^{ba})## by definition. I suspect going the long way round got you into a pickle here, because you've somehow ended up with extra factors of the metric that shouldn't be there. (By the way, don't put commas between indices. Some people use ##V_{a,b}## as shorthand for ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x_b}V_a##, and you're liable to be misinterpreted.)

Your approach to (g) and (h) (did you mean (h) or (e)?) appears correct, but I'm not sure you've lowered indices correctly on the tensor. What are the components of ##\eta_{ab}## in your convention?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top