Newton's Law of Gravitation Feynman Lectures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the velocity required for a bullet to maintain a circular orbit around the Earth, as presented in the Feynman Lectures on Physics. The necessary tangential velocity is approximately 7,905.7 m/s, derived using both gravitational equations and Newton's centripetal force. This velocity allows the projectile to counteract gravitational pull without falling back to Earth. The calculations utilize the Earth's radius and gravitational constant to demonstrate the relationship between velocity, radius, and gravitational force. Overall, the explanation clarifies how projectile motion relates to gravitational principles.
MarkFarrell82
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I've been reading the Feynman Lectures on Physics and I've stumbled on something. I understand the theory but not how they arrived at the answer. It's to do with firing a bullet from a gun and working out the speed it would need to travel in a curve around the Earth's surface in order to be at the same height that it started out. They prove it using plane geometry which has confused me because as far as I understand it the bullet would need to travel in an arc for which ultimately the equation will need an angle. The answer is about 5 miles a second. Please can someone explain to me how they would approach this problem assuming that the raduis of the Earth is 4000miles and the an object will fall 16ft/sec under the influence of gravity?

Thanks
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you accelerate a projectile to the appropriate tangential velocity, it will possesses insufficient velocity to escape the gravitational field just as it will be a velocity too great to allow the projectile’s descent to the planet’s surface. The projectile’s tangential velocity per second is just sufficient to counter the projectile’s rate of vertical free-fall descent per second per the rate of gravitational attraction at the given radius thereby allowing the projectile to maintain an indefinite circular orbit (assuming no frictional losses).

The following yields the velocity (v) required to orbit per a given radius (r) and a given heavenly body’s Mass (M), with ‘G’ being the Gravitational constant, 6.67e-11:

v = sqrt(GM / r)

sqrt(6.67e-11 * 5.976e+24 kg) / 6,377,569.11 meters) = 7,905.7 m/s

Or, you could apply Newton’s Centripetal Force. The earth’s gravitational acceleration (a) at its surface is 9.8 m/s^2. Applying the same Earth radius (r) of 6,377,569.11 meters, we derive a required tangential velocity (v) of:

v^2 = ar

Hence, the required tangential orbital velocity (v) is,

v = sqrt(ar)

sqrt(9.8 m/s^2 * 6,377,569.11 meters) = 7,905.7 m/s

I applied precision numerical values to demonstrate the interchangeable precision of the two equations. I hope you found this helpful.
 
Hi Gnosis
Thanks for the response. Only just had the chance to look at it.
Mark
 
MarkFarrell82 said:
Hi Gnosis
Thanks for the response. Only just had the chance to look at it.
Mark

It was my pleasure, Mark.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top