Newton's laws of motion discussion question

AI Thread Summary
Kicking a large rock can hurt more than kicking a small pebble due to the differences in mass and the resulting forces involved. While Newton's laws indicate that the same force is applied to both objects, the larger rock requires more force to accelerate, which can lead to greater impact on the foot. The discussion highlights that the pain experienced is not solely dependent on the mass of the object but also on how hard the object is kicked. The impulse-momentum perspective suggests that the foot may bounce back more when kicking a heavy rock, contributing to the sensation of pain. Ultimately, the relationship between mass, force, and acceleration plays a critical role in understanding the physical experience of kicking different objects.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
this is from chapter 4 of university physics of young and freedman
q19 why can it hurt your foot more to kick a big rock than a small pebble? must the big rock hurt more? explain?
but I can't see the answer at all by just applying Newtons law
in the scenario of the small pebble
mp is small
you apply a force F to the pebble it applies the same force on your foot and get ap = F/mp
and you get af=F/mf

incase of the large rock
mr>mp

but the same F is applied the acceleration =F/mr
and af=F/mf
so the acceleration of your foot is independent of the mass of the kicked object as I see and the only difference is that the pebble will get more acceleration so how by Newtons laws can I answer this question? is it related to other concepts? if so why ask it in the Newton's laws section?
 
  • Like
Likes Biki Balami
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that you apply the same force to both pebble and rock. But which is most likely to require generating larger amounts of force? Which is harder to accelerate?
 
well in the question you only kick the rock you don't have to move it the same distance but ok if you want me to assume that you want to accelerate the rock the same acceleration of the pebble then the it would always hurt more to hit the heavier rock so the second part doesn't make sense...
but my point is that it doesn't matter why what do you kick because the force you will feel is the force you will apply right? the kicked object's mass only affect the acceleration "it" not the acceleration I would received right?
 
madah12 said:
well in the question you only kick the rock you don't have to move it the same distance but ok if you want me to assume that you want to accelerate the rock the same acceleration of the pebble then the it would always hurt more to hit the heavier rock so the second part doesn't make sense...
Imagine you have two identical-looking rocks in front of you. Unknown to you, only one is a real heavy rock, the other is just a light, plastic fake rock. You attempt to kick each one in a similar manner with a hard, swift kick. What happens?

As far as part 2 goes, it seems ambiguous. Does kicking a heavy rock have to hurt more? Of course not. Kick the rock very lightly; kick the pebble as hard as you can.
 
Doc Al said:
Imagine you have two identical-looking rocks in front of you. Unknown to you, only one is a real heavy rock, the other is just a light, plastic fake rock. You attempt to kick each one in a similar manner with a hard, swift kick. What happens?

As far as part 2 goes, it seems ambiguous. Does kicking a heavy rock have to hurt more? Of course not. Kick the rock very lightly; kick the pebble as hard as you can.

the light one will accelerate more while the heavy one will accelerate less
also how do we look at this from impulse momentum point of view? from experience when I kick a heavy rock my feet bounce back a little but if i hit a small one it goes forward so is the impulse at the first scenario bigger than the initial momentum but opposite in direction? while it isn't bigger in the second? does the fact the my feet bounce back have to do with the amount of pain my I feel?
 
madah12 said:
the light one will accelerate more while the heavy one will accelerate less
And what does that say about the acceleration of your foot?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top