Newton’s laws of motion -- Does the 1st Law presuppose the 2nd Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Newton's first law of motion is necessary if the second law is already accepted as valid. A scenario is presented involving a mass moving in a circle on a frictionless plane, where cutting the string results in the second law yielding a trivial equation. This example illustrates that without the first law, the second law alone does not adequately describe the mass's subsequent motion. The implication is that the first law provides essential context for understanding motion when forces are not acting. Thus, the first law is foundational for the application of the second law in real-world scenarios.
feesicksman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Is Newton‘s first law of motion necessary supposing that we already know that Newton‘s second law of motion is valid?
Relevant Equations
None
.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework question? If so, tell us what you think before you can receive help.
 
feesicksman said:
Homework Statement: Is Newton‘s first law of motion necessary supposing that we already know that Newton‘s second law of motion is valid?
Good question!
 
Consider a mass at the end of a string moving in a circle at constant speed on a horizontal frictionless plane. At some point the string is cut. After the string is cut, the second law says$$0 = 0$$ which is not very useful for describing the motion of the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and gmax137
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top