Newton’s laws of motion -- Does the 1st Law presuppose the 2nd Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Newton's first law of motion is necessary if the second law is already accepted as valid. A scenario is presented involving a mass moving in a circle on a frictionless plane, where cutting the string results in the second law yielding a trivial equation. This example illustrates that without the first law, the second law alone does not adequately describe the mass's subsequent motion. The implication is that the first law provides essential context for understanding motion when forces are not acting. Thus, the first law is foundational for the application of the second law in real-world scenarios.
feesicksman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Is Newton‘s first law of motion necessary supposing that we already know that Newton‘s second law of motion is valid?
Relevant Equations
None
.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework question? If so, tell us what you think before you can receive help.
 
feesicksman said:
Homework Statement: Is Newton‘s first law of motion necessary supposing that we already know that Newton‘s second law of motion is valid?
Good question!
 
Consider a mass at the end of a string moving in a circle at constant speed on a horizontal frictionless plane. At some point the string is cut. After the string is cut, the second law says$$0 = 0$$ which is not very useful for describing the motion of the mass.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and gmax137
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
View full post »

Similar threads

Newton's 2nd Law: Why is Resistance Considered a Positive Force?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Rocket acceleration problem: confused about Newton's 2nd Law
Replies
42
Views
5K
Question about the 2nd law of thermodynamics (heat loss)
Replies
1
Views
1K
How many discs will slide off the board as it decelerates?
Replies
17
Views
1K
Newton's third law and weight
Replies
13
Views
929
Having a hard time learning Newton's 2nd law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Newton's second law (My turtle named Newton being accelerated)
Replies
9
Views
2K
Newton's Third Law for book on a table
Replies
8
Views
3K
Understanding Newton's 2nd Law of Motion
Replies
6
Views
2K
Newton's law problem: Helicopter lifting a box with a rope
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top