Newton's logic behind taking force as change in momentum w.r.t time?

AI Thread Summary
Newton defined force as the change in momentum over time to provide a concise mathematical representation of motion. This definition emphasizes the relationship between force and the rate of change of momentum, making it easier to analyze physical phenomena. Understanding energy in this context involves recognizing that more energy allows for greater capacity to perform work, such as moving or heating objects. The discussion seeks a deeper physical interpretation of these concepts beyond mere equations. Overall, the focus is on grasping the fundamental meanings behind Newton's definitions and their implications in physics.
joseph_seb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
why Newton had taken force as change in momentum per time?
i mean i need to get physical interpretation?what is this force actually?
also help me to get an idea about energy in sense(core concept)?
not with some equations?
i see these equations every time?but didn't know meanining?
somebody please help with these or give the name of texts which i should refer to?
Calculus was invented by Newton in order to discuss the way that things vary in a concise way,ie,if it is integral calculus,it is the summation of continuous values represented by function,ie we it has a meaning;i'd like to get a simliar kinda explanation,ie,how the eqn f=dp/dt states what happens so much better than a long sentence involving instances and examples;ie,if u were the one to formulate this eqn, why would you define force like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton observed that the change in momentum can be important in equations. Therefore, he named this quantity. It is now known as "force".

what is this force actually?
The derivative of the momentum with respect to time ("its change in time"), using the definition from above.

also help me to get an idea about energy in sense(core concept)?
More energy available -> more stuff you can move around, break, heat, whatever
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top