Why Are My Newton's Rings Experiment Results Inconsistent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the inconsistencies observed in the results of a Newton's Rings experiment, specifically regarding the calculation of the radius of curvature using a plano-convex lens. The formula used for calculating the radius is $$ R = \frac {D^2_n - D^2_m} {4(n-m)λ} $$, with λ being 589.3nm for sodium light. The user reports a significant discrepancy between the slope obtained from their graph and the expected value, leading to an incorrect radius estimation. Suggestions from other users include checking for potential errors in measurement units and ensuring all factors in the formula are accounted for.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Rings and interference patterns
  • Familiarity with the formula for calculating radius of curvature
  • Knowledge of using a traveling microscope for measurements
  • Basic principles of light wavelength, specifically sodium light at 589.3nm
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation and application of the formula $$ R = \frac {D^2_n - D^2_m} {4(n-m)λ} $$
  • Investigate potential measurement errors in diameter readings and unit conversions
  • Learn about the use of a spherometer for measuring lens curvature
  • Explore graphing techniques for analyzing experimental data in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, laboratory technicians, and educators involved in optics experiments and those seeking to understand the practical applications of interference patterns in light.

TachyonLord
Messages
54
Reaction score
6
When monochromatic light is incident on a plano convex lens(as shown in the picture), these dark rings are produced which are observed with the help of a traveling microscope.
Picture1.jpg
maxresdefault.jpg

The procedure requires us to measure the diameter of each ring (We need to measure the diameter of at least 10 rings).
This is done by noting down the microscope reading at the left and right end of the ring and then subtracting the readings. The aim of the experiment is to calculate the radius of curvature of the given lens(which can also be done using a spherometer and we also do that to verify the result)

The radius is calculated using the formula $$ R = \frac {D^2_n - D^2_m} {4(n-m)λ} $$ where λ is the wavelength of the light used (For sodium, it is 589.3nm)

As a result, if we plot a graph as D2 vs n(where n is the ring number), we get a straight line.
As a result the formula can be simplified to $$ R = \frac {c} {4λ} $$
where c is the slope
The problem I'm encountering is that I get a very very nice fit for my graph, its almost a perfectly fitted straight line but the slope that I get is much much larger as compared to what we are supposed to get. When I tried to measure the radius using a spherometer, I got around 147cm which is really far from the radius that I get using the graph.
In order to get anything about 140cm, the slope from the graph should be around 0.03 but I get 0.218 which is really really far (and incorrect if you may but the straight graph just messes up my intuition).
I'll attach the graph:
14055086_10154050222533702_2639753554470574213_n.jpg


The radius found using the spherometer is much more likely to be correct but the graph that I got from my set of observations is near perfect too. It would be extremely wonderful if anyone could find out what is wrong or where I went wrong. I can't really ask my profs now because uni is closed for a week.
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.jpg
    Picture1.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 4,995
  • maxresdefault.jpg
    maxresdefault.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 1,856
  • 14055086_10154050222533702_2639753554470574213_n.jpg
    14055086_10154050222533702_2639753554470574213_n.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 3,522
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: horizz
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't been through the calculations but I see there is a factor of approximately ten difference. Are you using a mix of cm and mm, by any chance? It's easily done.
 
sophiecentaur said:
I haven't been through the calculations but I see there is a factor of approximately ten difference. Are you using a mix of cm and mm, by any chance? It's easily done.
I did consider that but I'm pretty sure I haven't and even if there was, since we're plotting D2 vs n, the error would either be of 100 or 0.01 because we're squaring D.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
TachyonLord said:
I did consider that but I'm pretty sure I haven't and even if there was, since we're plotting D2 vs n, the error would either be of 100 or 0.01 because we're squaring D.
Have you dropped the factor of 4 somewhere?
 
tech99 said:
Have you dropped the factor of 4 somewhere?
Like radius squared vs diameter squared ??
 
tech99 said:
Have you dropped the factor of 4 somewhere?
No, I'm pretty sure I haven't. I can send in a couple of my readings if you want to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K