Newton's Third Law: Equal & Opposite Forces?

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Third Law states that for every action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, but this does not imply that the forces are balanced. For example, when a person walks, they exert a downward force on the ground, which propels them forward, while the Earth exerts an equal and opposite force that does not result in a balanced state. The key distinction is that these forces act on different bodies, meaning they do not cancel each other out. Newton's Second Law explains that acceleration occurs due to a net force, which can exist even when forces are equal and opposite. Therefore, while the forces are equal and opposite, they do not create a balanced system.
Faded Maximus
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Newtons third law states that for every force there is an equal an opposite force. This doesn't mean that these forces are balanced though? Things like cars or people walking can still accelerate so these forces can't be balanced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you walk you push down on the ground and it moves you forwards.

At the same time, the Earth pushes back on you and moves backwards.

Equal and opposite.
 
Since they are equal and opposite though, would that imply that they are balanced forces?
 
The proper statement of Newton's third law is:

If body A exerts a force on body B, then body B exerts a force on body A that is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force exerted by body A.

By definition, they are equivalent. Newton's 2nd law deals with accelerations due to a net force.
 
Faded Maximus said:
Since they are equal and opposite though, would that imply that they are balanced forces?

The answer is no because the two forces act on different bodies.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top