MHB Next integer in this sequence, Challenge

RLBrown
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
$\sqrt{\text{mbh}_{29}}$ Challenge:

Sn = 3, 293, 7862, 32251, 7105061, 335283445, 12826573186, ?, ?, 44164106654163
S1 through S7 begin an infinite integer sequence, not found in OEIS.

1) Find S8 and S9.
2) Does S10 belong to Sn?
3) If S10 is incorrect, what is the correct value of S10?

Motivation:
I have always hated the "find the next number in this sequence" type of challenge. I wanted to create a sequence who's solution is so compelling and satisfying that it would be unique. Hopefully, the hints have accomplished that goal.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint:

1) $\sqrt{\text{mbh}_{29}}$ encourages us to examine Sn in base 29.
2) Clicking on S10 provides a tool.
3) Construct sequence Rn with R10 = 44164106654163, using pattern observed in S1 through S7.
4) In what sense is R the additive inverse of S? Use that to complete Sn.

Think mod 29^n and look at Sn2 to check your answers.
Trust me, this should be fun:)
now find S8 and S9.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

2
Replies
67
Views
11K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Replies
51
Views
10K
Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
33
Views
8K
2
Replies
93
Views
14K
2
Replies
60
Views
11K
3
Replies
114
Views
10K
2
Replies
64
Views
15K
Replies
39
Views
12K
Back
Top