What is Static According to Nikola Tesla?

AI Thread Summary
Nikola Tesla frequently discusses "static" in his autobiography, referring primarily to random noise that interferes with telegraphic and telephonic communications. This noise is likened to the hiss heard on AM radio or the snow on analog TV between channels. Tesla proposed a solution involving receivers connected to two ground points to reduce interference caused by charged air, claiming this method could significantly diminish noise. However, understanding his concepts can be challenging due to the complexity of his writing and the era in which he lived. Overall, Tesla's insights into static and its resolution remain a topic of intrigue and confusion.
iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
I was reading about Nikola Tesla in his autobiography where he constantly talks about "static". Do you know what that is? He also talks about solving statics.

Here's a quote from the book, "Its introduction for telegraphic, telephonic and similar uses will automatically cut out the statics and all other interferences with at present impose narrow limits to the application of the wireless."

There is a lot of places where he talks about static.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the context of telegraphy and telephony "statics" might refer to random noise.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, vanhees71 and Delta2
iVenky said:
Do you know what that is?

He's referring to random noise. Maybe you are too young to know of the static/noise, that hiss sound between channels on AM radio
or the snow seen and hiss heard on analog TV between channels ?
 
  • Like
Likes iVenky, vanhees71 and Delta2
davenn said:
He's referring to random noise. Maybe you are too young to know of the static/noise, that hiss sound between channels on AM radio
or the snow seen and hiss heard on analog TV between channels ?
Ok that's what I thought too. I have used radio in my life :P. He talks about a way to solve it. Are you aware of that?

He goes, "By employing receivers connected to two points of the ground, as suggested by me long ago, this trouble caused by the charged air, which is very series in structures as now built, is nullified and besides, the liability of all kinds of interference is reduced to about one-half, because of the directional character of the circuit."

I always thought it's not possible to get rid of thermal noise in the receiver, but I am not sure about getting rid of cosmic microwave background noise and other RF noise in receivers.
 
iVenky said:
"By employing receivers connected to two points of the ground, as suggested by me long ago, this trouble caused by the charged air, which is very series in structures as now built, is nullified and besides, the liability of all kinds of interference is reduced to about one-half, because of the directional character of the circuit."
I'm not understanding that quote. Were there any drawings or other illustration of what he is talking about? Thanks.
 
iVenky said:
I was reading about Nikola Tesla in his autobiography where he constantly talks about "static". Do you know what that is? He also talks about solving statics.

Here's a quote from the book, "Its introduction for telegraphic, telephonic and similar uses will automatically cut out the statics and all other interferences with at present impose narrow limits to the application of the wireless."

There is a lot of places where he talks about static.
I think you need to remember that Tesla wrote things a long time ago and he was a bit 'special', even at the time. Unless you are prepared to read an awful lot of his writing you are unlikely to get a handle on what he's trying to say. Imo, it's not really worth spending too much time in that direction. His modern day fans mainly like the hint of Magic in the stories that have made it down the decades.
 
  • Like
Likes iVenky
berkeman said:
I'm not understanding that quote. Were there any drawings or other illustration of what he is talking about? Thanks.
Not that I could find any. One thing I realized after reading Tesla's autobiography is that it's hard to understand what he is saying. It seems to me like his thought process is on a different dimension altogether.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Back
Top