No Inflation in Brane Cosmology: Is Dark Energy the Driver?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of inflation in brane cosmology and the role of dark energy in the expansion of the universe. Participants explore the implications of recent statements by Neil Turok regarding inflation and its potential absence in certain cosmological models, while also referencing competing theories and models within the context of cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of inflation in brane cosmology, suggesting that dark energy may instead drive the universe's expansion.
  • Another participant argues that most cosmological models, including brane models, incorporate some form of inflation, prompting a request for clarification on specific models.
  • A request for further reading on the topic is made, indicating a desire for more information on brane cosmology and inflation.
  • Several resources are provided, including links to academic papers and a layman’s book on cosmology, which discuss inflation and brane models.
  • Discussion includes a reference to Turok's bet with Hawking regarding the Planck satellite's ability to find evidence for inflation, with differing opinions on the likelihood of success.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the Planck satellite's design to detect B mode polarization, which is often associated with inflation, suggesting that future missions may be necessary.
  • There is a mention of the decoherence problem in the ekpyrotic phase of the cyclic model, indicating ongoing inquiries into the robustness of current models.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of inflation in brane cosmology, with some asserting its inclusion in most models while others propose alternatives. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitive role of dark energy versus inflation in the expansion of the universe.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific models referenced by participants, as well as the dependence on interpretations of Turok's statements and the implications of the Planck satellite's findings. The discussion also touches on unresolved issues related to the decoherence problem in cosmological models.

NeedBranes
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In brane cosmology how can there be no such thing as inflation. I was watching a lecture with Neil Turok and he said he made a bet with Hawking that says that the new Planck satellite will give us information that could prove against inflation. So, my question being, instead of inflation in the brane cosmological model is it just dark energy being the driving force of the expansion of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The brane cosmology models I am aware of admit to inflation in some form of another. Few cosmological models, brane or otherwise, get by without inflation. Did you have a particular model in mind?
 
I really just would like to read more about the subject. If anyone can refer me to something it would be greatly appreciated.
 
As I understand the model popsed by Niel Toruk is not the only comsological model that deals with branes. There are others, some of which include inflation , I believe the term "brane inflation" is employed. Here is an exmaple
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610221
If you would like to read more about the brane clash model, you can read this layman book:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0385509642/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Its a really great book even if you hate the brane clash model. It explains inflation very very well ands gives an insiders view of some recent history of cosmology. Just a really really good read.

As far as Turoks bet with Hawking. It seems Hawking likes throwing money away on bets. I am sure he's got more than any of his fellows so I doubt he cares. Turok bet him that Planck won't find the B mode polarisation which is often called a smoking gun for inflation.Well I've met a few people that work on Planck and they are clear its not designed to find the B mode , that would most likely take a new generation of space probe like EPIC or CORE. If Planck is very lucky it will find it, but its not likley. I don't think that says much about inflation version the brane clash model, but Turok made a pretty smart bet and Hawking's got more money so he likley doesn't mind going out on a limb and taking a gamble. I hope Hawking wins because thhat will be major disocvery but my monies on Turok.
 
Last edited:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610221
If you would like to read more about the brane clash model, you can read this layman book:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0385509642/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Its a really great book even if you hate the brane clash model. It explains inflation very very well ands gives an insiders view of some recent history of cosmology. Just a really really good read.

So it is still the best model we have? Any latest feed on decoherance problem in ekpyrotic phase of cyclic model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K