No problem, glad I could help! :smile:

  • Thread starter Thread starter Austin0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Austin0
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
1
I have been trying to learn the proper acceleration math , and don't understand d^{2}x , or d^{2}t as it appears , where d seems to have the normal meaning of delta.

Is this simply equivalent to dx^{2} or dt^{2} ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Austin0! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Austin0 said:
I … don't understand d^{2}x , or d^{2}t as it appears , where d seems to have the normal meaning of delta.

Is this simply equivalent to dx^{2} or dt^{2} ?

No.

d is an operator (a sort of function), and d2 means that you perform the operation twice.

If you perform it both times with respect to the same variable, say y, you put dy2 on the bottom, so it's d2/dy2 (x), or d2x/dy2.

If you perform it once with respect to y and once with respect to z, you put dxdy on the bottom, so it's d2/dydz (x), or d2x/dydz. :smile:

If you want to see it in ∆s …

define ∆+x to be the increase in x if you increase y by ∆y, and ∆-x to be the decrease in x if you decrease y by ∆y.

Then dx/dy = lim ∆+x/∆y = lim ∆-x/∆y

and d2x/dy2 = lim ∆(dx/dy))/∆y

= lim (∆+x - ∆-x)/(∆y)2

(and, by comparison, (dx/dy)2 = dx/dy = lim (∆x)/(∆y)2, which is not the same :wink:)

For example, if x = yn,

then ∆+x = nyn-1∆y + (1/2)n(n-1)yn-2(∆y)2 + …,

and ∆-x = nyn-1∆y - (1/2)n(n-1)yn-2(∆y)2 + …,

so dx/dy = lim ∆+x/∆y = lim ∆-x/∆y = nyn-1,

and d2x/dy2 = lim (∆+x - ∆-x)/(∆y)2 = n(n-1)yn-2 :smile:
 
Last edited:
tiny-tim said:
Hi Austin0! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


No.

d is an operator (a sort of function), and d2 means that you perform the operation twice.

If you perform it both times with respect to the same variable, say y, you put dy2 on the bottom, so it's d2/dy2 (x), or d2x/dy2.

If you perform it once with respect to y and once with respect to z, you put dxdy on the bottom, so it's d2/dydz (x), or d2x/dydz. :smile:

If you want to see it in ∆s …

define ∆+x to be the increase in x if you increase y by ∆y, and ∆-x to be the decrease in x if you decrease y by ∆y.

Then dx/dy = lim ∆+x/∆y = lim ∆-x/∆y

and d2x/dy2 = lim ∆(dx/dy))/∆y

= lim (∆+x - ∆-x)/(∆y)2

(and, by comparison, (dx/dy)2 = dx/dy = lim (∆x)/(∆y)2, which is not the same :wink:)

For example, if x = yn,

then ∆+x = nyn-1∆y + (1/2)n(n-1)yn-2(∆y)2 + …,

and ∆-x = nyn-1∆y - (1/2)n(n-1)yn-2(∆y)2 + …,

so dx/dy = lim ∆+x/∆y = lim ∆-x/∆y = nyn-1,

and d2x/dy2 = lim (∆+x - ∆-x)/(∆y)2 = n(n-1)yn-2 :smile:


Hi tiny-tim You have been very helpful. I didn't have the correct understanding of d at all.
I thought it was simply the total change in whatever it was applied to ,irrespective of whatever function it was used in. I.e. Simply the total interval. The distance represented by dx as the difference between two specific coordinate x's.
I think your explication has made it clear but I guess time will tell.
Thanks for your responce and friendly greeting :smile:
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top