What Wave Patterns Emerge from Randomized Buoy Generators on a Calm Lake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryWertM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Wave
HarryWertM
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of wave generators [a floating buoy; a cable down to the lake bed; a motor rhythmically pulling and releasing the buoy] are placed in a limited section of a large, glass-smooth lake. The buoys are at random locations an average of a few wavelengths apart. The phases and frequencies of the generators are randomized, within some narrow frequency range. The question is: What wave pattern is observed at a large distance from the buoyed area?

I have no math to tackle this. My intuition says that very small choppy waves will be observed. The wavelengths of the "small" waves will be much shorter than the generating buoy waves, and highly variable. I do not know if any "quantization" effects would be involved. I am wondering if there might be some kind of very long-length "standing wave" formed around the buoy area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AFIK thi scenario is a large scale phenomenon where we would not use QM to solve wave shapes and forms. So a classical approach is justified here.
 
As i see it you just can't get waves with frequency much higher (or wave lengths much shorter) than those beloning in the narrow frequency range of the generators. Otherwise the Fourier transform of the composite "small" wave forms would give non neglibible frequency components outside that narrow frequency range.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am looking at the Laughlin wave function and it contains the term $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q$$ In Wikipedia the lower index on ##\Pi## is ##1\le i<j\le N## and there is no upper index. I'm not sure what either mean. For example would $$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q=\prod_{k=2}^{N}\left[\prod_{j=1}^{k-1}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q\right]?$$ (It seems that ##k## cannot be 1 because there would be nothing to multiply in the second product). I'm not sure what else the...

Similar threads

Back
Top