Non-constant Current Density of Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field for a non-uniform current density in a wire. When the radius r is greater than R, the magnetic field can be expressed as B = μ₀I/2πr, where I is the total current. Participants clarify that while the total current I can be determined without integrating the current density for r > R, integrating from 0 to R is necessary to account for the entire wire's current. The integration yields the total current, confirming that it simplifies to I in the end. Overall, the group agrees that while integration may seem redundant, it is useful for verifying results when dealing with non-uniform current densities.
Aristotle
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Screen shot 2015-04-17 at 11.51.51 PM.png


Homework Equations


Ienclosed = ∫ JdA
∫B*ds = m0*I

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my take of finding [/B]when r is greater than R--so, the magnetic field is m0*I/2pir, since
B(2pir) = m0*I
This is because the amperian circle covers the whole wire.

Can somebody verify that this is correct? (when r>R) I mean it doesn't matter that the density is nonunfirom correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct but still you got to calculate I which will not be the same as if the current density was uniform.
 
Delta² said:
Correct but still you got to calculate I which will not be the same as if the current density was uniform.

Oh I understand that "I" will be different when r is INSIDE the circle. But "I" outside should just be "I" total without having to integrate right?
 
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density? it will be

I=\int\limits_{0}^{R}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}

while for r<=R it will be
I=\int\limits_{0}^{r}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}
 
Last edited:
Delta² said:
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density?
Well originally I integrated it from limits R to r (r>R) for J*dA...and got an answer of a current equaling to I(r^5-R^5)/(R^5). And so B equaled m0*I(r^5-R^5)/(2piR^5*r)...so then I realized integrating for the amper circle outside would not be reasonable.
 
I mean sure finding r inside the circle is a different current, but my main concern is outside.
 
Delta² said:
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density? it will be

I=\int\limits_{0}^{R}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}
Doing it at 0 to R is the complete wire. It doesn't relate to the r of the amp. circle that is outside it, right?
 
Aristotle said:
Well originally I integrated it from limits R to r (r>R) for J*dA...and got an answer of a current equaling to I(r^5-R^5)/(R^5). And so B equaled m0*I(r^5-R^5)/(2piR^5*r)...so then I realized integrating for the amper circle outside would not be reasonable.
You integrated current density from R to r? But the current density is zero outside the wire isn't it?
Aristotle said:
Doing it at 0 to R is the complete wire. It doesn't relate to the r of the amp. circle that is outside it, right?
when the radius r is >R then you integrate from 0 to R cause the loop encloses the whole wire.
 
Delta² said:
You integrated current density from R to r? But the current density is zero outside the wire isn't it?

when the radius r is >R then you integrate from 0 to R cause the loop encloses the whole wire.
Oh yeah you make a great point, I just thought back on the section of Gauss and remembered that. Thanks!
But as I integrated from 0 to R...and plugged in the Jo for the current density...I got a result of just "I". (a good indication that it is correct).

So it wouldn't really be necessary at all to integrate right?--I mean everything cancels in the end to get a final "Itot". Or is it safe to just integrate anyways?
 
  • #10
Well integrating from 0 to R i seem to get a total current I=\frac{2}{5}\pi J_0R
 
  • #11
Delta² said:
Well integrating from 0 to R i seem to get a total current I=\frac{2}{5}\pi J_0R

Yup same here--when you find j0 and I am sure you could--you get 5I/2PiR :)...it then equals to I haha
 
  • #12
I guess integrating is a good way to show it, and indeed you're correct about the integration, but it would seem a tad redundant in having to do that since I that is enc equals the current of the wire in its entirety.
 
  • #13
yes ok, it is just that the total current I is not given, instead you are given the current density equation, R and J_0.
 
  • #14
Delta² said:
yes ok, it is just that the total current I is not given, instead you are given the current density equation, R and J_0.
I appreciate your help Delta!
 
Back
Top