Non-equilibrium conduction electrons

BeauGeste
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Here's the issue I'm trying to wade through:

1. If you excite electrons from valence band to conduction band (with a laser say), you are out of thermodynamic equilibrium. In some recombination time, the system will go back to equilibrium. All well in good.

2. Now let us consider a very long recombination time. What are the non-equilibrium electrons in the conduction band doing? Do they relax to the band minima? Are they distributed according to the Fermi function? What is the chemical potential doing? Is it possible to even define a chemical potential here?

Any help with these questions would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BeauGeste said:
Here's the issue I'm trying to wade through:

1. If you excite electrons from valence band to conduction band (with a laser say), you are out of thermodynamic equilibrium. In some recombination time, the system will go back to equilibrium. All well in good.

2. Now let us consider a very long recombination time. What are the non-equilibrium electrons in the conduction band doing? Do they relax to the band minima? Are they distributed according to the Fermi function? What is the chemical potential doing? Is it possible to even define a chemical potential here?

Any help with these questions would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Er.. something with a "long recombination time" would be a semiconductor at room temperature with the band gap small enough to sustain a population of charge career in the conduction band. Isn't this the same thing? If it is, then don't we know a lot already about the behavior of the electrons in the conduction band?

Zz.
 
BeauGeste,

Do they relax to the band minima?

Sure. As long as the band minimum isn't populated then these electrons will relax to the band minimum through electron-phonon interaction. The conduction electron will emit a photon when it relaxes back to the valence band.

Are they distributed according to the Fermi function?

Absolutely not! The Fermi-Dirac distribution function applies only to electrons that are thermally excited.

What is the chemical potential doing? Is it possible to even define a chemical potential here?

The chemical potential doesn't change. It is strictly a function of temperature and not on the level of electron-photon excitement.

Best Regards

modey3
 
I'm afraid that I have to disagree with Modey, because it's all a matter of timescale. In most semiconductors, the interband lifetime is relatively long, on the order of microseconds. However, intraband scattering processes are usually short, having lifetimes on the order of 100 fs or even less. These intraband processes will thermalize the distribution within the band rather quickly, and so you're actually right: they'll reach a quasi-equilibrium distributed according to the Fermi function. In semiconductor lasers, we call this a quasi-Fermi level.
 
I stand corrected. For very long recombination times that makes sense and as you said the Fermi distribution can only apply for small time scales between the excitement and recombination of electrons.

modey3
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top