A Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Liquids

linkrid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Do I need triple and higher correlation functions in this equations to make non-Equilibrium kinetic models that describe liquids?
Molecular Transport equations for Liquids are harder to compute than that for gases, because intermolecular interactions are far more important in liquids. A System of equations for particle Distribution function and the correlation functions (BBGKY-Hierarchy) is used in General. For gases, it is possible to derive e.g. the Boltzmann equation from the BBGKY-hierarchy. The structure of this hierarchy is given by

d/dt f_n + L_n f_n = C_n(f_(n+1))

with n-particle Distribution function f_n, n-particle Liouville Operator L_n and the n-particle collision Operator C_n that depends on the next higher Partition function f_(n+1). We can do an Expansion for the n-particle Distribution in Terms of correlation functions, e.g. f_2(x_1,x_2) = f_1(x_1) f_1(x_2)+g_2(x_1,x_2) for a two-body correlation function g_2 and Phase-space coordinates x. After some calculus, we can obtain equation of Motion for every correlation function.

Frequently I have heard that in liquids, the thermal kinetic Energy (that is kT) of a molecule is of similar magnitude as the interparticle interaction Energy. Also the collision Operator scales with particle number density times the effective volume of a particle (that is the volume it occupies and the volume, where it can attract other particles); in liquids this quantity cannot be assumed as a small perturbation. Some People say because of These reasons the hierarchy would couple to third and higher order correlations; this would make the calculations extremely complicated.

But can we develop a kinetic equation valid for liquids without incorporating higher correlation functions? When we say g_3 = 0 we have a closed set of equations. The Terms that account for intermolecular interactions would be

- A mean field force term, where the potential is averaged over the particle Distribution function (see also Vlasov equation, Hartree-Fock method, ...)
- A 2-body correlation term that couples to the inter-particle potential, but also accounts for the Motion of particles in an effective potential

One note to the 2-body correlation term: There will be a linear equation for g_2 in the form

A*g_2 = S

where S is the source of correlation dependent on Partition function and A is an effective Liouville Operator containing also the interparticle potential. The Operator A can, due to effective potential, Shield the particle from getting correlations with other particles. Would a Theory up to 2-body correlations predict characteristic Parameters of a simple liquid like viscosity, thermal conductivity, … with sufficient accuracy? Or are many-body correlations mandatory for having not too large Deviation of transport quantities from the experimental values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with this book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0123870321/?tag=pfamazon01-20

But I would say the history of theories using only 2-body correlations for liquids is not great. Sometimes things work, sometimes they don't, and I don't think people have had much success predicting ahead of time which it's going to be.
 
  • Like
Likes linkrid
Dear Mr. Grayce,

thank you very much for your Reply! In which cases a kinetic model that incorporates only 2-body correlations is sufficient for liquids? Is it sufficient for Special types of liquids?

And models that have 3-body correlations, but neglecting (or only roughly modeling) 4-body and higher order correlations? Will they have much better accuracy or are These still inaccurate, too?

A Reply I would highly acknowledge.
 
I just wanted to point out that one of the simplest and best studied liquids is the "Fermi liquid" for which a Boltzmann equation can be derived and inclusion of only two body interactions is a good approximation.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top