- #1

- 709

- 0

Can someone explain how non-Hermitian Hamiltonians are used to account for particle decay?

- Thread starter wofsy
- Start date

- #1

- 709

- 0

Can someone explain how non-Hermitian Hamiltonians are used to account for particle decay?

- #2

- 980

- 2

- #3

- 709

- 0

I infer from you terse reply that the decay is seen in the imaginary part of the eigen-value. It becomes an exponential decay of the state amplitudes. Yes?

- #4

- 1,746

- 49

Yes, imaginary eigenvalues mean that the probability of finding the particle decreases exponentially with time (decay). However, you should keep in mind that this is an approximate way to study decays. In this approach the probability is not conserved and the evolution is non-unitary, which contradicts basic postulates of quantum mechanics.I infer from you terse reply that the decay is seen in the imaginary part of the eigen-value. It becomes an exponential decay of the state amplitudes. Yes?

If you want to have a rigorous model of decays, you'll need to form a bigger Hilbert space, which includes states of both unstable particle and its decay products. In this Hilbert space the decay can be described by a Hermitian Hamiltonian and unitary time evolution operator. The total probability will be conserved, as required. The decreasing probability of finding the particle will be compensated by increasing probability of finding decay products.

- #5

- 709

- 0

very cool. ThanksYes, imaginary eigenvalues mean that the probability of finding the particle decreases exponentially with time (decay). However, you should keep in mind that this is an approximate way to study decays. In this approach the probability is not conserved and the evolution is non-unitary, which contradicts basic postulates of quantum mechanics.

If you want to have a rigorous model of decays, you'll need to form a bigger Hilbert space, which includes states of both unstable particle and its decay products. In this Hilbert space the decay can be described by a Hermitian Hamiltonian and unitary time evolution operator. The total probability will be conserved, as required. The decreasing probability of finding the particle will be compensated by increasing probability of finding decay products.

- #6

- 111

- 0

[tex]\frac{d\mid\Psi\mid^2}{dt}+\nabla\cdot\vec{j}=0[/tex]

where the quantum current j is non vanishing. There are some simple cases where you could solve this exactly, like V=V0 for a<x<a+d and V=infinite at x<0 and else V=0. Eigenstates are normally degenerated symmetrically so that E=E0+/-i*Ej which means yo have both decaying and growing solution in time.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 7K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 18K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 807

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 677

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 5K