Non linear field of a long bar magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the "end effect" observed in a long bar magnet, where the magnetic field is stronger at the ends due to overlapping north and south pole fields. A specific example is given with a 0.5 cm square bar magnet that exhibits a linear field in the center but a non-linear field at the ends, causing objects to be repelled when placed near the ends. The phenomenon occurs because magnetic flux lines exit the magnet before reaching the pole, leading to unintended magnetization of nearby ferromagnetic materials. Suggestions for reducing this end effect are sought to achieve a more uniform magnetic field along the entire length of the magnet. The goal is to enhance the usability of the magnet for various applications.
shustrng
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
How can the "end effect " be reduced on a long Bar magnet where the (for example) North pole is along the length of the top side. For example a 0.5 cm square bar say 5" long is stuck (South) onto a metal backing. The center length of 4" has a linear field effect but the ends have a bloom presumably as the N/S pole fields overlap. For example a small washer can be placed anywhere along the middle (top side) and will stay where placed, but when slid to the end, and released, it jumps back a cm away from the end? Basically, this non-linear field is stronger attracting at these ends. It is desired to reduce this end effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your experimental observations, some of the magnetic flux lines in the north direction exit the magnet near the north pole, but before they reach the pole. As a result, a thin piece of iron placed on top of the magnet near the north pole will also become magnetized in the northerly direction. The result is you then have two north poles right next to each other and they will repel. Alternatively, if the piece of iron were introduced adjacent to the pole (on the endface), the magnetization would be such that the south pole end of the piece of iron would be adjacent to the north pole of the magnet, and it would stick to it. ## \\ ## I think I interpreted your observations correctly, but I don't know how to reduce the effect.
 
Charles Link said:
If I understand your experimental observations, some of the magnetic flux lines in the north direction exit the magnet near the north pole, but before they reach the pole. As a result, a thin piece of iron placed on top of the magnet near the north pole will also become magnetized in the northerly direction. The result is you then have two north poles right next to each other and they will repel. Alternatively, if the piece of iron were introduced adjacent to the pole (on the endface), the magnetization would be such that the south pole end of the piece of iron would be adjacent to the north pole of the magnet, and it would stick to it. ## \\ ## I think I interpreted your observations correctly, but I don't know how to reduce the effect.

Thanks Charles. Well the sliding washer is just a simple trick to show the end effect but I hope to have suggestions to try to dampen/shorten this effect and be able to use the entire length as a more linear field for other uses.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top