Non-Orientable Quantum Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPBenowitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Surface
JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
I've heard that the universe could not possibly be non-orientable because of P-Violation such that a left-handed neutrino would transform into a right-handed neutrino which do not exist do to the left-right asymmetry of the universe. However this problem is resolvable because charge would also be flipped in a non-orientable universe thus we would be left with a right-handed anti-neutrino. The actual problem arises with the arrow of time. A non-orientable spacetime would be akin to a closed timelike curve and causality loses its meaning.

On the other hand, there is a difference between a spinor and a vector when defining left and right handedness. Spinors require a 720 degree rotation to return to their original state not a 360 degree rotation required by a vector. So in the sense of preserving an arrow of time when an observer traverses back to the start they did not arrive back at the same physical system. So why is it that a non-orientable universe is impossible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spinors require a 720 degree rotation to return to their original state not a 360 degree rotation required by a vector.
Common misconception. Spinors change sign under a 360-degree rotation. But spinors are double-valued. So under the rotation all spinors simply change their sign, and the physical state is unchanged.
 
Bill_K said:
Common misconception. Spinors change sign under a 360-degree rotation. But spinors are double-valued. So under the rotation all spinors simply change their sign, and the physical state is unchanged.

Right, but we can treat a mirror-image as a 180 degree rotation such that the mirror image of a vector and a spinor are not the same. If spin was a vector then on a non-orientable surface both the direction of spin and momentum would be flipped and a particle would retain its handedness. The problem is really with no global definition of handedness or charge on a non-orientable surface. At one point in time as the system evolves you can distinguish charge and handedness, there is information present but then after a sufficient enough time you no longer would be able to distinguish them. Where did the information go? We know information is conserved at all times just like energy is conserved at all times.

Analogously, a point on this non-orientable surface cannot possibly be a single point in time they must be separated by something that behaves like a delayed choice quantum eraser where in this sense "which-handedness" information is erased and we are left with a probability distribution of possible states. Information is conserved but the entropy of the system increases and thus would preserve an arrow of time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top