Non planar simplicial homology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coolphreak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on non-planar simplicial homology, participants explore the implications of computing homology groups for a complex defined in a 2D plane but existing in 3D space. The first homology group, H_1, can be computed accurately despite the complex's non-planar nature, as the definition of homology does not depend on the embedding in an ambient space. The presence of self-intersecting edges does not affect the computation of H_1, provided the chains are of the correct dimension. The second homology group, H_2, is also considered, but the focus remains on the validity of H_1 calculations in this context. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that homology theory is robust against the complexities of spatial embedding.
Coolphreak
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a complex like this:
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/5606/nonplanarpfum9.th.png

The original nodes are defined on the same plane, but the actual complex exists in 3 dimensions. If I want to find holes in the complex, would computing the 1st homology group work in this non planar case? There are 3 "holes" in this complex. Would computing the 2nd homology group work? However, I do not have any 3D components, just 2D components embedded in 3 space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A simplicial complex is a set of simplices. The embedding of it into some space is immaterial (or it wouldn't be a very good homology theory). Just work out H_1.
 
Last edited:
so even with self intersecting edges (non planar graphs), the first homology group can be correctly computed no matter the embedding dimension? As long as the chains are of the correct dimension?
 
Does the definition of homology have anything to do with its embedding in an ambient space? No. There is absolutely nothing in the definition that even takes this into account. It is the quotient space of the kernel of one map by the image of another.
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Physics and Integer Computation with Eisenstein Integers
Replies
1
Views
2K
Geometric description of (simplicial)homologous cycles
Replies
6
Views
4K
BRS: Simplicial Homology with Macaulay2
Replies
2
Views
3K
B What Is the Fourth Dimension and How Does It Work?
Replies
3
Views
2K
± sqrt(b^2 - a^2) = ± b ± ai ?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Wrapping a 3D space wihtin a 4D space
Replies
4
Views
3K
Python Help solving a geometrical matching issue with Graph Neural Networks
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Solving simultaneous vector equations
Replies
11
Views
3K
How Do Quaternions Enhance Understanding of 3D Rotations?
Replies
14
Views
6K
BRS: Cellular homology with Macaulay2
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top