Non-Reflective Surface or Polarizing Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgetnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable surface for image analysis that minimizes background reflection. Three main ideas are proposed: a surface that polarizes light, a surface that deflects polarized light, and a non-reflective surface that absorbs light. Participants suggest using first-surface mirrors for polarization but note concerns about vibration resistance. The user specifies the need for a material that can withstand vibrations similar to a cellphone and is easy to clean. The conversation emphasizes the importance of material properties for effective image analysis.
hgetnet
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Forums goers:

Ok, I have a project that deals with image analysis. The idea is to make the process very easy upon myself and make the background on which I will place objects as dark as possible.

1st idea I have is that of a surface that will polarize light when light reflects from it. I googled for such a surface and I couldn't find any.

2nd idea is to have a surface that deflects or reflects away a polarized light.

3rd idea is to have a non-reflective surface that absorbs most (if not all) light that falls upon it. Again, I couldn't find any such material for sell.

ANYONE KNOW WHERE I CAN BUY ANY ONE OF THESE SURFACES?

Thanks in advance.

p.s. 1- the material can not be velvet or anything that can not be wiped with a piece of damp cloth.
2- the material should withstand a medium vibration (a bit above cellphone vibration) for 10 minutes at a time.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
hgetnet said:
Hello Physics Forums goers:

Ok, I have a project that deals with image analysis. The idea is to make the process very easy upon myself and make the background on which I will place objects as dark as possible.

1st idea I have is that of a surface that will polarize light when light reflects from it. I googled for such a surface and I couldn't find any.

2nd idea is to have a surface that deflects or reflects away a polarized light.

3rd idea is to have a non-reflective surface that absorbs most (if not all) light that falls upon it. Again, I couldn't find any such material for sell.

ANYONE KNOW WHERE I CAN BUY ANY ONE OF THESE SURFACES?

Thanks in advance.

p.s. the material can not be velvet or anything that can not be wiped with a piece of damp cloth.

For the first example, can you just use a mirror behind a polarizing sheet? Whatever light gets reflected off of that would seem like it would be polarized...
 
berkeman said:
For the first example, can you just use a mirror behind a polarizing sheet? Whatever light gets reflected off of that would seem like it would be polarized...

I thought about that but the mirror would not be able to stand the vibration that I am going to subject the surface to. I should have stated that in my request, but I appreciate the fast response.
 
hgetnet said:
I thought about that but the mirror would not be able to stand the vibration that I am going to subject the surface to. I should have stated that in my request, but I appreciate the fast response.

Ah. But you can get some pretty strong first-surface mirrors (FSMs). What dimensions are you thinking of for the reflective sheet? What vibration accelerations are you anticipating?
 
berkeman said:
Ah. But you can get some pretty strong first-surface mirrors (FSMs). What dimensions are you thinking of for the reflective sheet? What vibration accelerations are you anticipating?

FSMs sound like something I need to research more! Thanks!

For the reflective sheet, I am thinking 11" X 11 ". Anything slightly above or below will do as well.

For the vibration, I am thinking of something like the magnitude of a vibrating cellphone (please excuse my limited knowledge in mechanical engineering). Or if it makes sense, I am thinking of a vibration that is capable of separating a number of small pebbles (m&m's or any similar shaped objects) clamping on top of each other so that it is easy to optically analyze them.
 
If you reflect light off of a non-metallic surface at Brewster's angle, the light is polarized. You could reflect light off the front surface of an opaque plate glass sheet (I have seen opaque black). The refracted light is all absorbed in the glass. See
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/phyopt/polref.html
Bob S
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top