Nonlinear electric susceptibility and degenerate frequencies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the nonlinear electric susceptibility tensor, specifically regarding the distinguishability of frequencies in second harmonic generation (SHG) processes. When two collinear beams of the same frequency ω are used, only one susceptibility component, ##\chi^{(2)}(2\omega;\omega,\omega)##, is relevant. However, when the beams propagate in different directions, they must be labeled as ω1 and ω2, resulting in multiple susceptibility components such as ##\chi^{(2)}(2\omega;\omega_1,\omega_1)## and ##\chi^{(2)}(2\omega;\omega_2,\omega_2)##. The effective susceptibility, ##d_{eff}##, is defined for beams propagating in the same direction and is crucial for calculating nonlinear source polarization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonlinear optics principles
  • Familiarity with second harmonic generation (SHG) processes
  • Knowledge of electric susceptibility tensors
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating complex amplitudes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of effective susceptibility ##d_{eff}## in various beam configurations
  • Explore the phase matching conditions in nonlinear optics
  • Read "Applied Nonlinear Optics" by Zernike and Midwinter for practical examples
  • Investigate the impact of beam propagation direction on nonlinear optical processes
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in the field of nonlinear optics, optical engineers, and anyone involved in the study of electric susceptibility and SHG processes will benefit from this discussion.

Yorre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm having a little trouble understanding the "distinguishability" of frequencies in the nonlinear electric susceptibility tensor. As far as I understand, if we have a SHG process with two collinear beams of the same polarization and frequency ω, there is only one susceptibility component 2ω;ω,ω. But if these beams propagate to different directions, still with the same frequency ω, must we label the frequencies as ω1 and ω2 and end up with components 2ω;ω1,ω1 , 2ω;ω2,ω2 , 2ω;ω1,ω2 and 2ω;ω2,ω1? So can the propagation alone make the beams distinct?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second order susceptibility, as well as susceptibility in the other orders, are material specific and is not dependent on the external field. So, I believe propagation direction should not change the value of ##\chi^{(2)}(2\omega;\omega,\omega)##. The quantities which will look different for different propagation alignments are, among others, the effective susceptibility and the phase matching condition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yorre
Thanks for the reply, blue_leaf. So when calculating the NL source polarization, the complex amplitudes of the two fields create four propagation terms (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2) and four phase matching conditions, while the effective susceptibility can be taken as the common factor when both fields have the same polarization?
 
Sorry, I forgot that the effective susceptibility ##d_{eff}## was defined when the two beams are propagating in the same direction, and it reads
$$
P(\omega_3) = d_{eff}E(\omega_1)E(\omega_2)
$$
where ##P(\omega_3) = |\mathbf{P}(\omega_3)|## and ##E(\omega_i) = |\mathbf{E}(\omega_i)|##. For crossing beams, I am not sure if you can derive a similar expression which relates the magnitudes of the polarization and fields like that above. An example of the derivation of ##d_{eff}## can be found in "Applied Nonlinear Optics" by Zernike and Midwinter for some cases. May be you can derive ##d_{eff}## for general case of crossing beams.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K