Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation Dispersion Relation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (NSE) expressed as $$i\frac{∂A}{∂z} = \frac{1}{2}β_2\frac{∂^2A}{∂t^2}-\gamma|A^2|A$$. The steady state solution is derived as $$A(z)=A_0e^{i\gamma {A_0}^2 z}$$. A perturbation analysis leads to a linearized equation $$i\frac{∂\epsilon}{∂z} = \frac{1}{2}β_2\frac{∂^2\epsilon}{∂t^2}-\gamma{A_0}^2(\epsilon + \epsilon^*)$$. The user encounters discrepancies in the dispersion relation, yielding two distinct expressions for the wavevector $$\kappa$$, indicating potential errors in their calculations or assumptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (NSE)
  • Familiarity with complex wave functions and perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of dispersion relations in wave mechanics
  • Proficiency in solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation and its applications in optics
  • Learn about perturbation methods in nonlinear systems
  • Investigate the implications of complex wavevectors in wave propagation
  • Explore the stability analysis of solutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and graduate students specializing in nonlinear dynamics, wave mechanics, and optical physics will benefit from this discussion.

Mimb8
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (NSE) is presented as:

$$i\frac{∂A}{∂z} = \frac{1}{2}β_2\frac{∂^2A}{∂t^2}-\gamma|A^2|A$$

The steady state solution

$$A(z)$$

Can be derived as an Ansatz given by:

$$ A(z) = \rho(z)e^{i\phi(z)}$$

By substituting and solving the ODE, the steady state solution results in:

$$A(z)=A_0e^{i\gamma {A_0}^2 z}$$

The quest at hand seeks to determine if the solution is stable by introducing a perturbation such that time dependent solution is:

$$A(z,t) = (A_0 + \epsilon(z,t))e^{i\gamma {A_0}^2 z}$$

By pluggin it back into the NSE and retaining only the linear terms in the perturbation, the linearized equation results in:

$$i\frac{∂\epsilon}{∂z} = \frac{1}{2}β_2\frac{∂^2\epsilon}{∂t^2}-\gamma{A_0}^2(\epsilon + \epsilon^*)$$

Supposing that the solution is of the form:

$$\epsilon(z,t) = \epsilon_1cos(\kappa z - \omega t) + i\epsilon_2sin(\kappa z - \omega t) $$

A side goal of this homework task is to also determine the dispersion relation that I can get by substituting the supposed solution. But here I ran into a problem: my attempt at determining the dispersion relation gave me the subsequent expression

$$ -i\kappa \epsilon_1sin(\kappa z - \omega t) -\kappa \epsilon_2cos(\kappa z - \omega t) + \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_1 \omega^2 \beta_2cos(\kappa z - \omega t) + i\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_2 \omega^2 \beta_2sin(\kappa z - \omega t) + 2 \epsilon_1 \gamma {A_0}^2cos(\kappa z - \omega t) = 0 $$

Supposedly, the solution is right but the dispersion relation gives me distinct expressions:

$$ \kappa = \frac{\epsilon_2}{2\epsilon_1} \omega^2 \beta_2 $$

And also,

$$ \kappa = \frac{\epsilon_1}{2\epsilon_2} \omega^2 \beta_2 + 2\frac{\epsilon_1}{\epsilon_2} \gamma {A_0}^2 $$

Moreover, the wavevector is to be complex because the next question in my homework asks be to calculated the gain in power given by:

$$ g(\omega) = 2Im(\kappa) $$

I have checked the math of the linear equation I've obtained and I don't seem to I have missed anything but it is surely strange to have different real expressions for the wavevector!

Can anyone help me figure this out?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression of the NSD is incorrect. The Schrödinger equation relates the first derivative in time of the wave function to its second derivative in space.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K