Nonrelativistic free particle propagators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the propagation amplitude for a free, nonrelativistic particle in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. Participants explore the integration techniques involved in evaluating the propagator and address potential issues in the derivation process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the propagation amplitude for a free particle and outlines the integration process, expressing difficulty in arriving at the expected result.
  • Another participant suggests extending the integration boundaries and using properties of the integrand to simplify the calculation, indicating that the sine function can be expressed in terms of the imaginary part of an exponential function.
  • A third participant confirms that the Gaussian integral methods yield the correct factors, indicating a successful resolution of the earlier issues.
  • A later reply points out a potential error regarding the sign in the exponential term related to time, suggesting a need for correction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the initial derivation, as there are conflicting views regarding the sign in the exponential and the overall approach to the integration.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects concerning the assumptions made in the integration process, particularly related to the treatment of the exponential term and the implications of extending integration boundaries.

Theage
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
This type of integration is a special case of something that occurs over and over in QM and QFT (it's everywhere in Peskin and Schroeder), but I am having a bit of trouble working out the details. Set \hbar=1 and consider the propagation amplitude for a free, nonrelativistic particle to move from x to y in time t, given by U(x,y,t)=\langle y\vert e^{i(p^2/2m)t}\vert x\rangle. Peskin and Schroeder evaluate this as a 3-dimensional momentum space integral, and it's easy to manipulate and find U(x,y,t)=\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}e^{i(p^2/2m)t}e^{i\vec{p}\cdot\Delta x}=\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}e^{i(p^2/2m)t}e^{ip\Delta x\cos\theta} where \Delta \vec x=\vec y -\vec x. The next step is to convert to spherical coordinates, which I don't think I have a problem with: U(x,y,t)=\frac 1{(2\pi)^3}\int_0^\infty dp\, p^2\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\int_{-1}^1d\cos\theta e^{ip^2t/2m}e^{ip\Delta x\cos\theta}. After performing the angular integrations (which are both trivial) I find U(x,y,t)=\frac 2{\Delta x(2\pi)^2}\int_0^\infty dp\,p e^{ip^2t/2m}\sin(p\Delta x) which not only looks completely intractable but also is nothing like the answer one is supposed to find for a free propagator. Have I screwed this up or is there just some last touch I'm not seeing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve this integrale you first note that the integrand is even under ##p\to-p## and therefore you can extend the boundaries up to ##-\infty##, but paying an addition factor of 1/2. Then you recall that ##\sin(p\Delta x)=\text{Im} e^{ip\Delta x}## and once you have done that you're left if an ordinary gaussian integral (complete the square and so on and so forth). Just remember to take the imaginary part at the end of the gaussian integration.
 
Thanks! Amazingly the 2\pi's work out using Gaussian integral methods.
 
And there should be a minus sign in the exponential with the time!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K