NORDITA , anything interesting?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skydivephil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
AI Thread Summary
The NORDITA Perspectives of Fundamental Cosmology Conference concluded recently, with Francesca, a participant, delivering an impressive talk covering the history of quantum gravity and recent advancements in quantum cosmology. Her slides, available on the conference website, detail significant developments, including the MUKHANOV-SASAKI equation's LQC-corrected form, which could revolutionize loop quantum cosmology by indicating that the bounce occurs at much lower energy densities. Notably, Ed Wilson-Ewing's recent paper, which discusses the implications of this bounce, was not presented at the conference, raising questions about its absence. The discussion highlights the potential for new insights in cosmology stemming from these recent findings. Overall, the conference showcased important advancements in the field of fundamental cosmology.
skydivephil
Messages
470
Reaction score
9
I believe the Nordita Perspectives of Fundamental Cosmology Conference ends today, did anybody go. Anything interesting to report to PF?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Well francesca is a PF member and she attended and gave a talk. She might not see this thread but you could write her a PM and see if she is not too busy and wants to post some report here. She might not have time and might decline but it wouldn't be wrong to ask.

Another thing would be just to go to the NORDITA conference website and look at francesca's set of slides. It is a nice long set of slides. I don't know how she could have fit it into an hour talk. It reviews the history of QG and the application to quantum cosmology and then talks about various people's recent quantum cosmology work.

I'll get the main conference link in case you don't have it.
Here is the main link:
http://agenda.albanova.se/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2998
You click on "speaker list" and you get a list of talks, many of which have PDF slides links.
http://agenda.albanova.se/confAuthorIndex.py?confId=2998
You scroll down to near the end where Francesca's talk is listed and click on "slides":
http://agenda.albanova.se/getFile.p...sId=250&materialId=slides&confId=2998
She did a good job, I was impressed with how much she covered in her talk.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Marcus
 
I wish I could give you some more substantial news from the Fundamental Cosmo conference
but here is a little something.
It is a little over halfway thru Francesca's slides where she mentions the
MUKHANOV-SASAKI equation in it's LQC-corrected form, in parallel with the effective LQC version of Wheeler-Dewitt.

This has just come on the scene and I think it will revolutionize LQC. When the effect of matter is included in the LQC model, using M-S equation, the model will bounce much sooner when the density is still much lower.

Francesca refers to a paper she did with Cailleteau, Barrau, Grain, where they put the Mukhanov-Sasaki. But for me the big impact only appears when you look at the very recent (November) paper of Ed Wilson-Ewing.

It is strange that Ed W-E was not presenting this paper at the NORDITA conference. Maybe the work is too new and he does not have slides, or he didn't get invited. This will surely get presented at the Loops 2013 conference. He seems to be saying that the bounce happens when the energy density is still only one billionth of Planck density.
=============
http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6736
Consistency of holonomy-corrected scalar, vector and tensor perturbations in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Thomas Cailleteau, Aurelien Barrau, Julien Grain, Francesca Vidotto
(Submitted on 28 Jun 2012)
Loop Quantum Cosmology yields two kinds of quantum corrections to the effective equations of motion for cosmological perturbations. Here we focus on the holonomy kind and we study the problem of the closure of the resulting algebra of constraints. Up to now, tensor, vector and scalar perturbations were studied independently, leading to different algebras of constraints. The structures of the related algebras were imposed by the requirement of anomaly freedom. In this article we show that the algebra can be modified by a very simple quantum correction, holding for all types of perturbations. This demonstrates the consistency of the theory and shows that lessons from the study of scalar perturbations should be taken into account when studying tensor modes. The Mukhanov-Sasaki equations of motion are similarly modified by a simple term.
5 pages

http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.6269

The Matter Bounce Scenario in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Edward Wilson-Ewing
(Submitted on 27 Nov 2012)
In the matter bounce scenario, a dust-dominated contracting space-time generates scale-invariant perturbations that, assuming a nonsingular bouncing cosmology, propagate to the expanding branch and set appropriate initial conditions for the radiation-dominated era. Since this scenario depends on the presence of a bounce, it seems appropriate to consider it in the context of loop quantum cosmology where a bouncing universe naturally arises. It turns out that quantum gravity effects play an important role beyond simply providing the bounce. Indeed, quantum gravity corrections to the Mukhanov-Sasaki equations significantly modify some of the results obtained in a purely classical setting: while the predicted spectra of scalar and tensor perturbations are both almost scale-invariant with identical small red tilts in agreement with previous results, the tensor to scalar ratio is now expected to be r≈ 9 x 10-4, which is much smaller than the original classical prediction. Finally, for the predicted amplitude of the scalar perturbations to agree with observations, the critical density in loop quantum cosmology must be of the order ρcrit ~ 10-9 ρPlanck.
8 pages
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top