A Normal force and force of friction inside a tube

AI Thread Summary
When inserting a cylinder into a narrow elastic tube, the exerted force increases due to the increasing contact area, which raises the normal force. Although the pressure exerted by the tube remains constant, the larger surface area in contact with the cylinder results in a greater total radial force. This increased normal force also elevates the threshold of static friction, requiring more effort to push the cylinder further in. The discussion highlights the relationship between pressure, contact area, and force in this specific scenario. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping how force interactions change in constrained environments.
arhg
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Dear all,

Me and some colleagues (non-physicists) are discussing how force works when passing a cylinder (which we are holding) into a narrow tube. As we insert more of the cylinder into the tube, the force we are exerting is increasing. My theory is that the normal force is increasing and his theory is that it is only due to lubricant Stribeck curve.

We understand that surface area is not taken into account for normal force, which normally is the weight. However, in this case, as we insert more of the cylinder into the tube, doesn't the normal force increases? I thought that this case is different because it is not the weight (as we are holding the cylinder straight, in the air) but the pressure that is creating a force, and the pressure the narrow tube is exerting on the cylinder is the same, but as surface area increases, the normal force would increase. What do you think?
Edit: The outside tube in this case is elastic.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct. The pressure (force per unit area) exerted by the outer elastic tube is the same, but the contact area increases as the inner cylinder is pushed farther in. If the contact area increases so does the radial total force. This raises the upper threshold of static friction so that more force is needed to push the cylinder farther in.

Assuming that all four of your fingers are equally strong (ignore the thumb), why is it easier to wrap around and hold a heavy rod vertical using all four fingers instead of just one?
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and jack action
Thank you so much for the explanation.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Back
Top