Norway archaeologists find 'world's oldest runestone'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Archaeologists in Norway have discovered what is believed to be the world's oldest runestone during a grave excavation near Tyrifjord, west of Oslo. The runestone, a flat block of brownish sandstone, features inscriptions that date back to between A.D. 1 and 250, making it potentially the earliest example of written words in Scandinavia. The Museum of Cultural History in Oslo emphasizes that this find represents the oldest datable runestone, predating similar artifacts by several centuries. The discovery highlights the significance of runic writing in understanding early Scandinavian history.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,354
Reaction score
7,174
The runestone was discovered in the fall of 2021 during an excavation of a grave near Tyrifjord, west of Oslo, in a region known for several monumental archaeological finds. Items in the cremation pit — burnt bones and charcoal — indicate that the runes likely were inscribed between A.D. 1 and 250.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/archaeologists-in-norway-find-worlds-oldest-runestone

https://apnews.com/article/norway-oslo-31524a0dbb0405b08fb2fba6ffafdfaa
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Archaeologists in Norway said Tuesday that have found a runestone which they claim is the world’s oldest, saying the inscriptions are up to 2,000 years old and date back to the earliest days of the enigmatic history of runic writing.

The flat, square block of brownish sandstone has carved scribbles, which may be the earliest example of words recorded in writing in Scandinavia, the Museum of Cultural History in Oslo said. It said it was “among the oldest runic inscriptions ever found” and “the oldest datable runestone in the world.”
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and LittleSchwinger
Science news on Phys.org
At 2000 years, it was said to be "several hundred centuries older than similar earliest known artifacts."

Oops.
 
I hope that when the archeologists were digging it up, they didn't "rune" it...

My ex-wife used to pronounce "ruin" that way; i.e., one syllable rather than two.
 
It's apparently in Proto-Germanic. Pretty interesting find.
 
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/

Similar threads

Back
Top