Nostalgia for a Physical Thing That No Longer Exists

  • Thread starter Thread starter pedong
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of physical entities that can be perceived but no longer exist, focusing on photons and astrophysical phenomena. While photons are stable particles that do not decay, the conversation highlights that light from distant quasars and proto-galaxies allows us to see objects that have since ceased to exist due to the finite speed of light. The analogy between optical telescopes and the human eye emphasizes how both detect light through diffraction patterns. The conversation also hints at a riddle-like quality to the topic, prompting further contemplation. Ultimately, the discussion explores the intriguing relationship between perception and the existence of physical entities.
pedong
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
is there a certain physical thing that you can see with your naked eyes, but it doesn´t exists anymore.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons.
 
cmos said:
Photons.

I was under the impression that photons exist and that they were completely stable particles that did not decay. On the other hand, if you consider astrophysical phenomena, quasars and proto-galaxies that can be seen in the distant reaches of space no longer exist but can be seen because of the finite speed of light. I know that these bodies are not observed with the naked eye, but optical telescopes and the camera on the Hubble telescope are, in many ways, analogous to the human eye because they are all diffraction pattern sensors.
 
Clearly we can see visible light. But to see visible light your eye has to absorb a photon. Once absorbed, that photon ceases to exist. :smile:
 
Brilliant. I never thought of that.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Can We See the Moon From 238,900 Miles Away?
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Proving the Existence of Particles: An Exploration
2
Replies
94
Views
6K
I Reverse Projector: New Tech for Immersive Video Experience
Replies
15
Views
1K
B Can physics deal with the existence of Pi?
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
I Physical Meaning of the Imaginary Part of a Wave Function
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How is IR ink able to be seen with specialized filters?
Replies
3
Views
3K
My physics exam preparations feel like rote actions, I'm not understanding
Replies
2
Views
994
B The Sun's Influence on the Moon's Orbit: Is it Negligible?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How Do Different Wavefront Shapes Appear to the Human Eye?
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Are physical constants 'constant' axiomatically, or is there a theory?
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top