Notation Confusion in Linear Transformations

AI Thread Summary
The notation {f∈F(ℝ,ℝ): f(3)=5} indicates that 'f' is a function mapping real numbers to real numbers, specifically defined such that f(3) equals 5. This does not imply that the function's range encompasses all real numbers; rather, it suggests that the range is a subset of the real numbers. Understanding this distinction is crucial for interpreting linear transformations correctly. The confusion often arises from the assumption that the notation implies a broader range than it actually does. Clarifying these notational meanings is essential for grasping the concepts of linear transformations.
Offlinedoctor
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm just having trouble understanding some of the notations given, when attempting questions such as the following:

{f\inF(ℝ,ℝ): f(3)=5}.

Is it just saying that, the function 'f' spans all real values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Offlinedoctor said:
I'm just having trouble understanding some of the notations given, when attempting questions such as the following:

{f\inF(ℝ,ℝ): f(3)=5}.

Is it just saying that, the function 'f' spans all real values?
That is saying that f is a function from the set of real numbers to the set of real numbers, such that when x= 3, f(x)= 5.

It does NOT necessarily mean that the range of f includes all real numbers, just that the range is some subset of the real numbers.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top