Notation for third order derivative of a vector function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation and interpretation of the third order derivative of a vector function, specifically f''', which is identified as a trilinear form rather than a matrix or cube. The conversation clarifies that while f' is a linear form and f'' is a bilinear form, f''' can be expressed as f'''(x)(h,h,h), yielding a real number. Participants emphasize the complexity of discussing these derivatives strictly in matrix algebra and suggest using partitioned matrices for clarity. References to linear, bilinear, and trilinear forms are requested for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and derivatives
  • Familiarity with linear forms and bilinear forms
  • Knowledge of matrix algebra and its applications
  • Basic concepts of trilinear forms in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of trilinear forms in calculus
  • Study the conversion between linear forms and vectors in inner product spaces
  • Explore partitioned matrices and their use in higher-order derivatives
  • Find comprehensive textbooks or resources on multivariable calculus focusing on derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying advanced calculus or vector analysis who seeks to deepen their understanding of higher-order derivatives and their notations.

patiobarbecue
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. let f: R^n -> R, then f' is a vector and f'' is a matrix, how about f'''? it is a cube? I guess we have to use matrix notation for f'''. I have seen the notation " f'''(x)(h,h,h) ", which is a real number for sure. I have no clue how to operate it though. Any reference on third order derivative and its notation?


Homework Equations



3. f'' is a matrix, then f''' looks like a cube, where the third dimension are vectors of the following elements: d^3 f/dx_i dx_j dx_1, d^3 f/dx_i dx_j dx_2, ..., d^3 f/dx_i dx_j dx_n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, f'(x) is not a vector -- it's a linear form. Specifically, it's the linear form with the property that
f'(x)(v) = \nabla_v f(x)​
Of course, once you've chosen an inner product, you can convert linear forms into vectors and vice versa, and forget there's a distinction.

e.g. if vectors are Nx1 "column vectors", then f'(x) is a row vector. With respect to the dot product, we can transpose f'(x) to get a vector.

Similarly, f''(x) is not a matrix -- it's a bilinear form.
f''(x)(v,w) = \nabla_v \nabla_w f(x)​
But you can convert bilinear forms into matrices and vice versa.

f'''(x) is a trilinear form. Alas it is somewhat inconvenient to try and talk about such things strictly in the language of matrix algebra. :frown: You can try using partitioned matrices -- it would be a row vector of row vectors of row vectors. (Of course, you could transpose one dimension so that it's a row vector of matrices. But I think that would be awkward...)



P.S. if you insist on directional derivatives being made in the direction of a unit vector, then by \nabla_v I really mean
|v| \nabla_{v / |v|}​
(Or, in the case where v is zero, I mean the zero function)
 
my textbook never talks about linear form, bilinear or trilinear form. please give me a good reference. thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K