NPN transistor with lowest Vbe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fizz_it
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Npn Transistor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding an NPN transistor with the lowest base-emitter voltage (Vbe) suitable for a low-power switching application with a collector voltage of 3.1 volts and a required emitter voltage above 2.5 volts. The BFU725F from NXP is recommended as a viable option, while germanium transistors, which have a Vbe around 0.2 to 0.3 volts, are also suggested. Additionally, the possibility of using a PNP transistor to invert the logic is mentioned, along with the suggestion to consider a basic BJT inverter design for better voltage handling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NPN and PNP transistor operation
  • Knowledge of base-emitter voltage (Vbe) characteristics
  • Familiarity with low-power circuit design
  • Basic principles of transistor switching and logic inversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and applications of the BFU725F NPN transistor from NXP
  • Explore the characteristics and use cases of germanium transistors
  • Learn about designing basic BJT inverters for logic applications
  • Investigate the advantages of using FETs in low-voltage switching applications
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, hobbyists designing low-power circuits, and anyone interested in optimizing transistor selection for switching applications.

fizz_it
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi - I am looking for an NPN transistor with the lowest Vbe I can get.

Any suggestions for specific transistors? (rather than a material class i.e. GaAs)

I only have 3.1 volts on the collector and the emitter voltage has to be above 2.5 volts to get a circuit to trip. So 3.1v - 0.7v = 2.4 (too low) So a standard BJT won't work. I don't have much PCB space so I can't add a boost circuit of any sort

This will operate only as a switch. And it is a low power application.


Help! Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A germanium transistor has Vbe of about 0.2 volts. I'm not sure if they are used anymore.

you could also just put an op-amp with variable gain to amplify voltage to trip the transistor.
 
skeptic2 - Thanks a 1x10^6

I am ordering the BFU725F from NXP
 
fizz_it said:
So 3.1v - 0.7v = 2.4 (too low) So a standard BJT won't work. I don't have much PCB space so I can't add a boost circuit of any sort

This will operate only as a switch. And it is a low power application.
Any suggestions for specific transistors?

I see you already ordered the transistor but another way to go was with a PNP. So the transistor would be normally on then shut off in the 2.5V situation.

Of course this would invert the logic of the switch. If that was unacceptable an inverter could bring it back.
 
fizz_it said:
Hi - I am looking for an NPN transistor with the lowest Vbe I can get.

chances are, you need to rethink your design.
 
Phrak said:
chances are, you need to rethink your design.

I'd suggest going with a basic BJT inverter:
http://courseware.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/courses/ee307/F03/13/02_13_PhilippeGonzaga.html

With the output current known, choose the base and collector resistances such that the BJT operates in saturation or cut-off, and you'll have almost the full operating voltage as the 'high' logic level, and only the BJT saturation voltage (usually 0.2V or lower) as the 'low' logic level.

If you can't have an inverted signal, you can cascade two of these stages together (though you'll have to run through the design calculations again for the output stage). This is something you wouldn't be able to do with simple base followers, as you're losing that 0.7V every time!

If you were attempting to actually power something (instead of just sending an output to another piece of logic) you can often use a FET as the output stage (and usually achieve a lower "0")
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
7K