Nuclear Engineering: Should ME Majors Pursue Certificate?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the decision of a Mechanical Engineering major considering a certificate in Nuclear Engineering. Participants explore the implications of focusing technical electives on Nuclear Engineering courses, the job market demand for such qualifications, and the potential impact on future career options.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the job market for Mechanical Engineers with Nuclear Engineering knowledge, questioning whether companies would prefer hiring dedicated nuclear engineers instead.
  • Another participant asserts that future energy demands will necessitate the use of nuclear technology, suggesting a positive outlook for jobs in this field.
  • Some participants note that there is currently high demand for nuclear engineers and Mechanical Engineers with nuclear backgrounds, along with competitive salaries.
  • Details about the core Nuclear Engineering courses are provided, highlighting their focus on nuclear science, reactor theory, and design principles.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential limitation of career options if all technical electives are concentrated in Nuclear Engineering, with some suggesting that it depends on the individual's career goals.
  • One participant suggests that focusing on Nuclear Engineering could be beneficial, given the aging electrical infrastructure in the U.S. and the anticipated demand for new nuclear reactors.
  • Another participant recommends considering electives in related fields such as Materials Science, Finite Element Analysis, and Computational Fluid Dynamics, which may offer broader career opportunities.
  • Worries are expressed about being geographically tied to nuclear power plants and the distribution of future job opportunities in Nuclear Engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether concentrating all electives in Nuclear Engineering is advisable. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of this decision on future job prospects and geographic flexibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding job market trends, the relevance of Nuclear Engineering in future energy solutions, and the potential for career flexibility based on elective choices. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the long-term demand for nuclear-related positions and the impact of educational focus on career paths.

JSBeckton
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
I am a Mechanical Engineering major and my school has recently revived its Nuclear Engineering classes. They are coming out with a 3 course sequence followed by 2 electives for a certificate of Nuclear Engineering to be added to my degree. To do this I would have to use my 3 technical electives on the Nuclear Eng classes. Would you advise that I do this? I know that my technical electives will impact my job search upon graduation and I wanted to know what kind of demand there will be for a ME major with Nuclear Engineering knowledge? Wouldn't a company just hire a nuclear engineer? I know that there are not a lot of NE's but there are not a lot of plants.

They are saying that Nuclear energy is the future with the new energy bill being passed and the incentives to build those plants now. I will be starting a CO-OP this summer for Relaint Energy so I will have some power plant experience. It sounds very interesting, I just don't want to back myself into a corner bu concentrating all tech electives in nuclear engineering. I really need advice.

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To meet future energy demands is going to require the use of nuclear technology.
 
I think that you will find a lot more jobs in engineering than physics, but that's not the only issue. You ultimatly have to decide what you want to do, then change your mind 2 years down the road an loose credits like the rest of us!
 
At the moment, there is high demand for nuclear engineers or ME's with a nuclear background, and the salaries are at the top.

What are the NE courses - would they be nuclear physics or reactor theory.

Most nuclear engineering programs are heavy on ME anyway - thermodynamics, hydraulics and mechanics.

Another alternative would be to take materials science or engineering courses, or mechanics of materials (if one hasn't already).

In what type of engineering is one planning to practice? One could do thermodynamics, hydraulics, mechanics, turbomachinery, corrosion, etc.
 
these are the first 3 core clases

ENGR 1700 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering
Introduction to nuclear science and technology; applications of
nuclear engineering; careers in nuclear industry; nuclear history;
reactor types; elementary nuclear and reactor physics; nuclear
radiation and safety; fuel cycle; regulations and sustainability.

ENGR 1701 Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactors (Spring 2007)
Nuclear physics, fission and fusion; cross-sections; neutron flux and
slowing-down; diffusion and transport; criticality condition and
calculations; reactor kinetics and shielding; heat generation,
transfer and cooling; reactor materials; reactor structure.
Prerequisite: ENGR 1700.

ENGR 1702 Nuclear Reactor Systems Design (Fall 2007)
Current and future reactor systems; nuclear power plants; balance of
plant configuration; fuel cycle management; reactor operation
principles; reactor plant economics; analysis and design of nuclear
systems; design projects. Prerequisite: ENGR 1701.

These will be followed by two Nuclear Engineering electives. Does it look like a good educational path with a promising future, or limit my options upon graduation?
 
I think the nuclear option will be a hands down winner. The energy [electrical] infrastructure in the US is aged and nearly obsolete. I foresee a huge demand for a newer, safer generation of nuclear powered reactors in the US. The worst thing that can happen in your case, IMO, is an extra semester of alternative energy technology courses at some point in the future.
 
Would it be bad to concentrate all of my electives in the Nuclear Engineering direction?
 
JSBeckton said:
Would it be bad to concentrate all of my electives in the Nuclear Engineering direction?
Not necessarily, but that depends on where you would like to go academically and professionally. If one is interested in power systems, or nuclear engineering, then concentrating most or all electives in nuclear engineering is the way to go.

The three courses:

ENGR 1700 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering

ENGR 1701 Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactors
(basically Introductory Nuclear Reactor Physics)

ENGR 1702 Nuclear Reactor Systems Design
(Plant design incorporating concepts in Reactor Physics, Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, and perhaps Materials and Mechanics of Materials).

from the core of an undergraduate nuclear engineering program. NE's would also take courses in nuclear physics (radiation), health physics, environmental protection, but otherwise, they take ME and EE courses.

I found courses in Materials Science and Engineering of use, and also in Corrosion and Control Theory.

A lot depends on the area of interest. If one is more interested in Mechanical or Structural design, the take more ME or Mechanics/Structural Eng. Courses.

I would recommend electives in the areas of Finite Element Analysis, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Materials. These areas are in demand across the disciplines of engineering.

I would also recommend graduate school for an MS at least.
 
I am just worreid that I would be forever linked to the location of Nuclear power plants and having little choice in where I live. Will the jobs incorporated with the furture of Nuclear Engineering be spread out?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K