Nuclear Materials: Prospects for the Future?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gmcastillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Materials Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the prospects of pursuing a career in "Nuclear Materials," particularly through a Master's program in "Nuclear Materials Synthesis, Ageing and Characterisation" followed by a PhD. Participants express concerns about the cyclical nature of the nuclear industry, noting that job opportunities can fluctuate based on market demands and government policies, especially in the US. The importance of nuclear materials for reactor safety and performance is acknowledged, but there is uncertainty regarding future job stability in this field compared to other areas of nuclear science, such as safety and reactor physics. The conversation also highlights the potential for growth in countries like China, which is expanding its nuclear power capacity. Additionally, there is curiosity about the specific roles and responsibilities of professionals in nuclear materials, indicating a need for clarity on career paths within this specialization.
gmcastillo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Is "Nuclear Materials" an area with good expectations? I know that materials are very important for nuclear civil: reactors lifetime, safety and performance, but I'm not sure to what point this a good prospects subject, when compared with other nuclear related domaines (safety, radiation protection, reactor physics...).

I've found a Masters in this subject ("Nuclear Materials Synthesis, Ageing and Characterisation" more specifically) and I think i want to do a PhD as well afterwords. I want to make sure it will not be a subject that will narrow my choices for the future.

Hope you guys can give me some orientations!

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gmcastillo said:
Hello,

Is "Nuclear Materials" an area with good expectations? I know that materials are very important for nuclear civil: reactors lifetime, safety and performance, but I'm not sure to what point this a good prospects subject, when compared with other nuclear related domaines (safety, radiation protection, reactor physics...).

I've found a Masters in this subject ("Nuclear Materials Synthesis, Ageing and Characterisation" more specifically) and I think i want to do a PhD as well afterwords. I want to make sure it will not be a subject that will narrow my choices for the future.

Hope you guys can give me some orientations!

Thank you in advance

I have known people who have done Nuclear Chemistry and Nuclear Engineering PhDs. This seems like it is a very cyclical area with booms and busts, at least in the US.

I suspect that this area will be important, as we diversify our energy options, but I am not sure I would bet significant sums of money (or my future) on this, given the history.

You may be better off studying something more generic.
 
The problem is, predicting the future in the nuclear industry as far as three years ahead (minimum for a PhD) is very difficult. If the US starts to build new plants then there will be a desperate need for all sorts of technical subjects related to nuclear. If they don't, then the US isn't going to need many.

On the other hand, how is your Mandarin? If you were fluent in Chinese and liked the idea of moving there (about which I have quite a few deeply contradictory emotions) then you should know China is building 28 new power reactors right now, and expects to continue building them for quite some time.

But other countries? Well... Your crystal ball is probably as good as mine.
 
Hello,

Thank you for your answers :)

Well, if it can be useful, I'm portuguese but I'm currently studying in France. Here there are a lot of things when it comes to nuclear; but well, it's the " booms and busts" that make me hesitate. However, I'm really willing to go wherever in order to work, I would even prefer it (to Canada, USA, Brazil...).
And more, I would like to know what a scientist in Nuclear materials does exactly. I can know more or less what would be a job of a Nuclear safety engineer, but not so much for a nuclear materials one.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top