Nuclear physics - number of nucleons on surface?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the number of nucleons at the surface of a nucleus with a total of A=220 nucleons. The original poster attempts to apply formulas related to the radius and surface area of a sphere to approach the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the volume and surface area of a sphere to estimate the number of nucleons at the surface. There are questions about the calculations and the interpretation of the ratios involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to think about the problem in terms of volume and surface area, suggesting a rough estimation approach. There is ongoing exploration of the concepts without a clear consensus on the method.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion regarding their calculations and the relationship between the total number of nucleons and those at the surface. The discussion emphasizes the need for a rough estimate rather than precise calculations.

aliaze1
Messages
173
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



For a nucleus of A=220, estimate very roughly how many nucleaons would be at the surface.

Homework Equations



R0=1.5 x 10-15

r=A1/3 x R0

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the formulas, I calculated R to be 7.2441729 x 10-15

The book says that the number of nucleons at the surface and the total number of nucleons has a ratio of ~1/r

1/r= 1.3804 x 1014

I tried the following:

1.3804 x 1014 = 220/x

which didn't make sense...

what am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the key here is 'very roughly'. You have a big sphere made of 220 smaller spheres. Roughly, what's the volume of that sphere in terms of the radius of the smaller sphere. What's the total area of that sphere? Each smaller sphere exposes, roughly, pi*r^2 of outer surface area. How many are there? Roughly.
 
so I could set a volume of a sphere as 220, solve for r, and then find the surface area based on that?
 
aliaze1 said:
so I could set a volume of a sphere as 220, solve for r, and then find the surface area based on that?

Yes, then use the area to estimate the number of spheres with volume 1 on the surface. I think that's what they're after. It's certainly a 'rough estimate'.
 
thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K