Undergrad Number of Binary Operations on a Set with a Special Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter Expiring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the number of binary operations on a set S with n elements, where the operation satisfies the property x * x = x for all x in S. The initial solution proposes that the total number of entries in an n x n matrix is n^2, with n predetermined diagonal entries, leading to n^(n^2 - n) total operations. However, feedback clarifies that the correct count is n^(n(n-1)), as there are n(n-1) entries off the diagonal where any of the n elements can be placed. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for the matrix structure in binary operations.
Expiring
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I was wondering if anyone could look over my solution to the question

"How many different binary operations on a set S with n elements have the property that for all x ∈ S, x * x = x ?"
Hello all,

The question I am tackling is as follows:

How many different binary operations on a set S with n elements have the property that for all x ∈ S, x * x = x ?

I was wondering if any of you could look over my solution and tell me if my logic is correct.

Solution:

Thinking of all the possible operations as entries on an n x n matrix, the entries x * x would lie on the diagonal of the matrix. The total number of entries in the matrix would be n^2, and, since the elements on the diagonal of the matrix (the elements x * x) have a pre-determined value (and there are n of these elements), the number of elements that we need to map would total n^2 - n.

So, when when we map n^2 - n elements to n elements, there will be n^(n^2 - n) total binary operations.

Any feedback would be great!
 
  • Like
Likes Bosko and Hill
Physics news on Phys.org
Very good. makes sense to me.
 
Expiring said:
I was wondering if any of you could look over my solution and tell me if my logic is correct.
Yes, you are right. ##n^{n(n-1)}## is the solution , if there no any other constraint on the binary operation *.
There are n(n-1) places in the matrix that are not on the diagonal.
On any of them you can put any of n elements of the set S.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
862
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K