Number of Posts Off By One?

  • Thread starter Thread starter William Thompson
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a perceived discrepancy in post counts, clarifying that the count may appear off by one due to the inclusion of the opening post. Users noted that posts outside of General Discussion do not contribute to the overall count. The forum prioritizes quality over quantity, emphasizing that a small number of high-quality posts is more valued than a large volume of low-quality contributions. Additionally, it was explained that the number of replies displayed for a thread is typically one less than the total post count because the initial post is counted separately. Overall, the focus remains on meaningful content rather than post totals.
William Thompson
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I think the number of posts are off by one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope, it looks fine. You have two posts outside of General Discussion (those posts don't count), and 2 posts on your post count. It doesn't really matter anyway. The post count is more of a frill around here. We don't have "levels" or anything based on post count, because we are focused more on quality of content here. We are more likely to notice and respect someone who only has 10 posts that are all top-quality, informative, helpful, and supported with references, than someone who has 1000 one-line, somewhat pointless posts.
 
If you are referring to the number of replies shown for a thread and the actual number of posts shown in the thread, yes, they differ by "one". The number of replies will show one less than the number of posts because the opening thread post counts as "1" post, although there may be "0" replies.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top